2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1685424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Capital Structure and the Contingent Capital Option

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the second area of research, Barucci and Del Viva (2011) extends an approach originally proposed by Goldstein et al (2001) where the underlying state variable is the claim to earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) and where straight debt, contingent capital, equity and bankruptcy costs are modeled as perpetual assets, thus allowing for closed-form valuation formulas. The default barrier level, the trigger level and the optimal capital structure are then calculated such as to maximize the equity value and the net value of the company.…”
Section: This Paper and Earlier Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the second area of research, Barucci and Del Viva (2011) extends an approach originally proposed by Goldstein et al (2001) where the underlying state variable is the claim to earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) and where straight debt, contingent capital, equity and bankruptcy costs are modeled as perpetual assets, thus allowing for closed-form valuation formulas. The default barrier level, the trigger level and the optimal capital structure are then calculated such as to maximize the equity value and the net value of the company.…”
Section: This Paper and Earlier Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barucci and Del Viva (2012) study the optimal capital structure of a bank issuing countercyclical contingent capital. Barucci and Del Viva (2013) extend their previous work to the case with dierent conversion rules. De Spiegeleer and Schoutens (2012, 2013) study CoCo issues with multiple triggers spread across a range of trigger levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In addition, if = = 0 in (25), i.e., CCS is not effectively included in the capital structure, or if we let → +∞, i.e., CCS is simplified into CoCo, we therefore recover from (25) a standard conclusion in corporate finance theory. That is, the optimal bankruptcy threshold * is given by: * = (1 − )( − ) + ( + + 1) , which is also derived by Barucci and Viva (2013).…”
Section: Endogenous Default Timingmentioning
confidence: 94%