2016
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a4995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Perfusion of Intradural Spinal Lesions

Abstract: SUMMARY:Fifteen patients with intradural spinal lesions were examined with an optimized dynamic contrast-enhanced MR perfusion sequence at 1.5T and 3T. SNR and mean contrast-to-noise ratio were better on 3T compared with 1.5T (P Յ .05). The goodness of fit of the Tofts and Tofts extended pharmacokinetic models was similar between 1.5T and 3T. Thus, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR perfusion of intradural spinal canal lesions is technically feasible at 1.5T and 3T, with better image quality at 3T.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging was performed in patients with cervical stenosis to relate average SC perfusion measurements within a global region to neurological scores and compression degree, but neither mapping of SC perfusion nor distinction between SC regions were performed. Technical feasibility of dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging for perfusion of intradural spinal lesions at cervical level was also assessed at 1.5T and 3T, but again quantification was performed globally for the whole lesion region, which involved high perfusion levels with respect to healthy tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging was performed in patients with cervical stenosis to relate average SC perfusion measurements within a global region to neurological scores and compression degree, but neither mapping of SC perfusion nor distinction between SC regions were performed. Technical feasibility of dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging for perfusion of intradural spinal lesions at cervical level was also assessed at 1.5T and 3T, but again quantification was performed globally for the whole lesion region, which involved high perfusion levels with respect to healthy tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%