Dynamic control of a dual active bridge for bidirectional AC charging

Rosekeit, Martin; Broeck, Christoph van der; Doncker, Rik W. De

doi:10.1109/icit.2015.7125404

Cited by 21 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This results in a fluctuating charging current as shown in Figure 8b and c. As reported in [40][41][42][43][44]83,84], batteries can be charged by double line frequency (100 or 120 Hz) current with negligible side effects on their performance.…”

Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning

confidence: 67%

Overview and Comparative Assessment of Single-Phase Power Converter Topologies of Inductive Wireless Charging Systems

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The acquisition of inductive power transfer (IPT) technology in commercial electric vehicles (EVs) alleviates the inherent burdens of high cost, limited driving range, and long charging time. In EV wireless charging systems using IPT, power electronic converters play a vital role to reduce the size and cost, as well as to maximize the efficiency of the overall system. Over the past years, significant research studies have been conducted by researchers to improve the performance of power conversion systems including the power converter topologies and control schemes. This paper aims to provide an overview of the existing state-of-the-art of power converter topologies for IPT systems in EV charging applications. In this paper, the widely adopted power conversion topologies for IPT systems are selected and their performance is compared in terms of input power factor, input current distortion, current stress, voltage stress, power losses on the converter, and cost. The single-stage matrix converter based IPT systems advantageously adopt the sinusoidal ripple current (SRC) charging technique to remove the intermediate DC-link capacitors, which improves system efficiency, power density and reduces cost. Finally, technical considerations and future opportunities of power converters in EV wireless charging applications are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning

confidence: 67%

Overview and Comparative Assessment of Single-Phase Power Converter Topologies of Inductive Wireless Charging Systems

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…m and n is the frequency exponent and flux density exponent, respectively. The wire losses P dcr of DC inductor L 1 and L 2 caused by DC resistance can be calculated as: (18) where I rms is the rms value of the peak current applied to the inductor, R dc is the DC resistance of the inductor. The total losses P L of DC inductor L 1 and L 2 can be calculated as: (19) Finally, in the unity charging mode, the total loss of this AC/DC converter P total can be acquired by equations:…”

Section: Power Loss Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In [18,19] a dual active-bridge (DAB) converter is considered due to its simple topology and good output waveforms, but the current in the circulation process is high. In [20], a converter consisting of a single-phase current-source rectifier and an auxiliary switching network is proposed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Single-Phase Bidirectional AC/DC Converter for V2G Applications

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a single-phase bidirectional current-source AC/DC converter for vehicle to grid (V2G) applications. The presented converter consists of a line frequency commutated unfolding bridge and an interleaved buck-boost stage. The low semiconductor losses of the line frequency commutated unfolding bridge contribute to the comparatively good efficiency of this converter. The buck and boost operating modes of the interleaved buck-boost stage provide operation over a wide battery voltage range. The interleaved structure of the interleaved buck-boost stage results in lower battery current ripple. In addition, sinusoidal input current, bidirectional power flow and reactive power compensation capability are also guaranteed. This paper presents the topology and operating principles of the presented converter. The feasibility of the converter is validated using MATLAB simulations, as well as experimental results.

show abstract

“…Without any further measures, neither SFPI nor PR regulators can reject the effect of voltage components of higher order and the emission of higher order current harmonics is the consequence. Thus, for the accurate control of the converter current at fundamental frequency and the rejection of higher order disturbance voltages multiple SFPI/PR regulators are used in [9], [10], [26] and [32] or alternatively repetitive control structures are applied as in [11], [27], [28] and [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%