1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.75.1767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Evolution of Pyramid Structures during Growth of Epitaxial Fe(001)Films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
73
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
12
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 A more detailed comparison between the two systems is complicated by the As out-diffusion in the latter case, 5,6 which is likely to influence the surface diffusion, and the lack of surface chemical data to complement the STM structural data for the Fe/MgO͑001͒ system. 16 Whereas STM shows marked differences in Fe island nucleation, corresponding PED data reveal that the local atomic structure and subsequent growth more appear to be quite similar for the two reconstructions. From forwardscattering PED measurements of Fe/GaAs͑001͒-2ϫ4 with thicknesses ranging from 0.25 to 4 ML it was concluded that the growth mode is predominantly layer-by-layer, with monolayer roughness.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 A more detailed comparison between the two systems is complicated by the As out-diffusion in the latter case, 5,6 which is likely to influence the surface diffusion, and the lack of surface chemical data to complement the STM structural data for the Fe/MgO͑001͒ system. 16 Whereas STM shows marked differences in Fe island nucleation, corresponding PED data reveal that the local atomic structure and subsequent growth more appear to be quite similar for the two reconstructions. From forwardscattering PED measurements of Fe/GaAs͑001͒-2ϫ4 with thicknesses ranging from 0.25 to 4 ML it was concluded that the growth mode is predominantly layer-by-layer, with monolayer roughness.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Our STM images show that the surface of a 35 ML ͑ϳ50 Å͒ Fe film ͑the highest coverage studied͒ grown at 175°C on the GaAs͑001͒-2ϫ4 surface has a height variation of only 2 ML ͑ϳ3 Å͒. 6 A more detailed comparison between the two systems is complicated by the As out-diffusion in the latter case, 5,6 which is likely to influence the surface diffusion, and the lack of surface chemical data to complement the STM structural data for the Fe/MgO͑001͒ system.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.12). Thus a realistic U (M) may only have a discrete set of minima; and for the hexagonal symmetry (111) crystal surfaces the local potential has the symmetry property 13) hence U (M) must have (at least) six minima corresponding to six preferred facet orientations that may appear in the growth process -cf. Fig.…”
Section: Here V Vs (H) = −V Vs (−H) = [V(h)−v(−h)]/2 and V Va (H) = Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4.1). In this approach [27], let us recall the interface is described by its height evolution equation that is generally of the form 13) where the local interface height velocity v(h) is expressed as the sum of v VS (h) = −v VS (−h) and v VA (h) = v VA (−h) -i.e. its odd and even parts, respectively.…”
Section: Deciphering the Role Of Vertical Growth Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation