2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic functional connectivity using state-based dynamic community structure: Method and application to opioid analgesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific examples of this would include using techniques derived from graph theory [53][54][55][56], connectivity analysis [57], or cognitive architectures [58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific examples of this would include using techniques derived from graph theory [53][54][55][56], connectivity analysis [57], or cognitive architectures [58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMMs have been previously largely applied to EEG and MEG data, e.g., (Baker et al, 2014). However, their applications to dynamic functional connectivity analysis of the fMRI data have been relatively limited (Højen-Sørensen and Hansen, 2000; Eavani et al, 2013; Suk et al, 2015; Robinson et al, 2015) given their potentials. Crucially, HMMs assume that observations are coupled through a set of temporally-dependent latent-state (hidden-state) variables, where the dependence is expressed as a first-order Markov chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have developed methods, e.g., based on nonstationary graphical Markov modeling with temporal smoothness [32–36], or state-space modeling combined with so-called stochastic blockmodels or related probabilistic models [37–40], whose applications to brain imaging data can also be found (e.g., [41, 42]). In contrast to such model-based methods, PCA-based eigenconnectivity analysis like MCF puts more emphasis on extracting the relevant aspects of data in a condensed manner rather than fully modeling and predicting the network (connectivity) changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%