2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-019-0024-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Mechanical Performance of Self-compacting Concrete Containing Crumb Rubber under High Strain Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AbdelAleem et al [25] recorded up to 80% lowering in compressive strength when using RA (< 4.75 mm) at a replacement level of 30% with fine aggregate by volume. Similar results are also found from most of other researchers [25,63,71,76].…”
Section: Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…AbdelAleem et al [25] recorded up to 80% lowering in compressive strength when using RA (< 4.75 mm) at a replacement level of 30% with fine aggregate by volume. Similar results are also found from most of other researchers [25,63,71,76].…”
Section: Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, the study of Yang et al [71] also witnessed the identical findings as Li et al [93] and Zhang et al [134].…”
Section: Impact Resistancesupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rubberized core samples incorporating 100 v/v% of GWTR revealed an obvious decline in mechanical strength: 77% and À80% percentage decreases was detected in RP100 and RP50RG50 samples, respectively. The strength loss can be explained by three main mechanisms [36]: (a) Rubber aggregates cannot sustain load due to their lower stiffness than sand; (b) there is as poor bond between GTWR and cement matrix; (c) when rubber is incorporated to concrete mixture, air bubbles adhere to its surface due to the hydrophobic characteristics. This leads to the increase of porosity and strength loss.…”
Section: Static Mechanical Testing: Three-point Flexuralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies have shown that the same material under dynamic impact loads responses completely different from that under static conditions. Although researches of investigating the dynamic properties of crumb rubber mortar by using Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) device or drop hammer (Atahan and Yücel, 2012;Liu et al, 2012;Feng et al, 2018;Gerges et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2019) have been found, the reference on the dynamic properties of CRM is still rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%