2016 21st International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/mmar.2016.7575258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic modeling and simulation of a bicycle stabilized by LQR control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LQR, LQI and LMI-based LQR control in [30]. The results turned the attention of the authors to a problem with lesser DoF to be concerned [32]. First, by introducing robustness into LQR/LQI control laws with results based on experiments [31], then introducing feedback linearization to a simulation model [44], with in-depth analysis of impact of initial conditions and robustness parameter [45], and different linearization schemes [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LQR, LQI and LMI-based LQR control in [30]. The results turned the attention of the authors to a problem with lesser DoF to be concerned [32]. First, by introducing robustness into LQR/LQI control laws with results based on experiments [31], then introducing feedback linearization to a simulation model [44], with in-depth analysis of impact of initial conditions and robustness parameter [45], and different linearization schemes [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as Lagrange, Euler equations or the detailed nonlinear Whipple scientific description [9], [10]; for example, [11] used the Linear-quadratic regulator (LQR algorithm) to analyze the bicycle mathematical model, this method is considered accurate but time-consuming at the same time. For a straightforward and time efficient modeling, the classical single-track model could be an alternative [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rare papers are for the situations of time-varying forward velocity. On the other hand, it is found that the conventional optimal controller design methods, like linear quadratic regulator (LQR) [20,21], can minimize the tracking error and control input, but cannot consider the transient performances, such as rise value, convergence time, and steady error. It depends on the practical experience to select a proper objective function, which hinders the applications of these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%