1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.58.115011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical supersymmetry breaking in a superstring inspired model

Abstract: We present a dilaton dominated scenario for supersymmetry breaking in a recently constructed realistic superstring inspired model with an anomalous U(1) symmetry. Supersymmetry is broken via gaugino condensation due to a confining SU(Nc) gauge group in the hidden sector. In particular, we find that by imposing on the model the phenomenological constraint of the absence of observed flavor changing neutral currents, there is a range of parameters related to the hidden sector and the Kahler potential for which we… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the family symmetry, such models can also explain the magnitude of the observed baryon asymmetry [7]. The expected phenomenology of neutrino oscillations depends on details of the model [8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the family symmetry, such models can also explain the magnitude of the observed baryon asymmetry [7]. The expected phenomenology of neutrino oscillations depends on details of the model [8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note, however, that it is not impossible that, if the solar neutrino problem is a result of the MSW mechanism, the ratio between ∆m 2 SN and ∆m 2 AN is accidentally, rather than parametrically, suppressed [10][11][12][13]. Then, the analysis of this work and of ref.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The masses of the two eigenstates ν 2 and ν 3 depend on unspecified factors of order one, and may differ by an order of magnitude [33,34]. They can therefore be consistent with the mass differences ∆m 2 ν1ν2 4 · 10 −6 − 1 · 10 −5 eV 2 [35] inferred from the MSW solution of the solar neutrino problem [36] and ∆m 2 ν2ν3 (5 · 10 −4 − 6 · 10 −3 ) eV 2 associated with the atmospheric neutrino deficit [27].…”
Section: Neutrino Masses and Mixingsmentioning
confidence: 99%