Dynamometer-Card Classification Uses Machine Learning

Abstract

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 194949, “Beam-Pump Dynamometer Card Classification Using Machine Learning,” by Sayed Ali Sharaf, Tatweer Petroleum; Patrick Bangert, SPE, Algorithmica Technologies; and Mohamed Fardan, Tatweer Petroleum, et al., prepared for the 2019 SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, 18–21 March. The paper has not been peer reviewed. In reciprocating rod pumping systems, analysis of dynamometer-card data can deliver valuable insight into the status of the pump, and can indicate if future action is required. The complete paper explains the steps taken to improve surveillance of beam pumps using dynamometer-card data and machine-learning techniques, and reviews lessons learned from executing the operator’s first artificial intelligence (AI) project. Background The oldest and most widely used method of artificial lift is called beam pumping, or the sucker-rod lift method. A dynamometer is a device used on beam pumps that measures load on the polished rod (top) and plots the load in relation to the rod position as the pumping unit moves through a stroke cycle. This plot is known as the surface card. A pump card is a plot of load vs. position on the pump’s plunger. The pump card is more useful for surveillance purposes because it filters effects of anything above the plunger and provides standard pump card shapes for interpreting pump operating conditions. Identification and diagnosis of beam pumps using the pump card is an expensive human visual-interpretation process, not only requiring significant labor time but also deep expertise in the domain. Use of machine-learning techniques for pattern recognition can help automate the visual interpretation process, increasing efficiency and reducing maintenance activities resulting from missed early diagnosis. Data Collection Sucker-rod pumps are widely deployed in the Bahrain Field. There are two different types of communication layers used across the field, radio and optical fiber. Almost 300 optical-fiber- connected beam-pump units (BPUs) have been selected for surveillance and advanced analysis. Fiber is used to avoid any communication issues during data collection for the AI project. The sampling rate of collection for each pump is one reading per 20 seconds, thus covering three pump cards per minute. All BPUs are connected to a central server that converts hardware-communication protocol used by a programmable logic controller into the open-platform-communication (OPC) protocol. Fig. 1 shows the details of the 209 values representing a single pump card being read from a BPU and stored in the operator database. During the data-collection period, a total of 5,380,163 pump cards from 297 BPUs were collected and stored in the database. Data Labeling and Preparation In machine learning, an important step after data collection is data labeling, which is usually performed manually by experts. The labeled data set is used to feed machine-learning algorithms that detect patterns specific to each class. A total of 35,292 pump cards has been labeled (more than 1,000 cards per day on average). A useful feature of the labeling software is that it allows labeling an entire time period of cards in one shot, although such labeling should be performed with care.

Optimization of Fracturing Parameters by Modified Genetic Algorithm in Shale Gas Reservoir

“…It has been applied in many fields for its fast calculation speed and high prediction accuracy. This method has been used in the petroleum industry for sweet spot searching [36], dynamometer-card classification [37] and water absorption prediction [38].…”

Production prediction based on ASGA-XGBoost in shale gas reservoir

“…Typically, XGBoost relies on the classification and regression tree (CART) as its fundamental learner, which is well-suited to solve classification and regression problems. Owing to its superior performance, XGBoost has been extensively implemented in the petroleum industry, including sweet spot searching (Tang et al, 2021), dynamometer-card classification (Chris, 2020), and water absorption prediction (Liu et al, 2020).…”

Smart Solution To Selecting Artificial Lift And Improve Oil Production Using Machine Learning.

“…Durante la vida productiva de un pozo los sistemas de levantamiento sufren fallas que son difíciles de determinar, para disminuir la incertidumbre en la determinación de problemas [3], [4] proponen un algoritmo para detectar fallas en los equipos de fondo y optimizar el SLA utilizando ML. Existen diferentes tipos de SLA utilizado en la industria d el petróleo, entre ellos uno de los más utilizados es el bo mb eo mecánico (BM), el cual tiene muchas partes móviles las cuales fácilmente tienden a presentar fallas [5], [6] propone el uso de ML para clasificar las cartas dinamométricas. El uso de los sistemas de bombeo electro sumergibles s on ampliamente utilizados, sin embargo solucionar fallas imp lica levantar todo el ensamblaje de fondo, por lo que [7] propone el uso de ML para predecir y reducir las fallas en el sistema.…”