2018
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201870041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E‐Skin Sensors: Piezoresistive E‐Skin Sensors Produced with Laser Engraved Molds (Adv. Electron. Mater. 9/2018)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultrahigh pressure sensitivity of 35.51 kPa −1 enables the sensor to be suitable for detecting subtle pressure touch. The pressure sensitivity of our piezoresistive sensor is orders of magnitude higher than that of conventional piezoresistive sensors [ 13,14,16,32,36 ] and three times higher than most microstructured piezoresistive sensors with well‐defined topologies, [ 5,6,15,17,30–32,34,35 ] which highlights the important role of the tentacle‐like conical micropillars for sensitivity enhancement. In the subsequent medium‐pressure range (0.25 kPa < σ < 4 kPa), our hierarchical composite sensor still possessed an exceptional pressure sensitivity of 11.71 kPa −1 for detecting small human motions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ultrahigh pressure sensitivity of 35.51 kPa −1 enables the sensor to be suitable for detecting subtle pressure touch. The pressure sensitivity of our piezoresistive sensor is orders of magnitude higher than that of conventional piezoresistive sensors [ 13,14,16,32,36 ] and three times higher than most microstructured piezoresistive sensors with well‐defined topologies, [ 5,6,15,17,30–32,34,35 ] which highlights the important role of the tentacle‐like conical micropillars for sensitivity enhancement. In the subsequent medium‐pressure range (0.25 kPa < σ < 4 kPa), our hierarchical composite sensor still possessed an exceptional pressure sensitivity of 11.71 kPa −1 for detecting small human motions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[7,27] Piezoresistive sensors, which depend on the contact area variation of electrical conductors during mechanical deformations, have been considered as promising candidates for the next generation of high-performance pressure sensors, due to their simple device construction, easy signal processing, and readout circuits. [28,29] Recently, to fabricate highly sensitive piezoresistive sensors, geometry effect of foams [6,18,19,30] and engineered microstructures, such as interlocked nanofibers, [31] microdomes, [15] micropyramids, [16,32] hollow spheres, [33] and micropillars, [17] have been incorporated to increase the contact area variation with low-pressure loading. However, these singlelevel-structured piezoresistive sensors would lose their sensitivity with increased pressure because stress will accumulate and concentrate in the pre-existing contact area with the incremental deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current researches on pressure sensors for living organisms are always studied separately to the in vitro detection and in vivo measurement. In general, there are plenty of options (such as the mature e-skin and other wearable systems) for the in vitro pressure monitoring with different mechanisms (such as piezoelectricity, , piezoresistivity, , and capacitance) and matrix materials (including metal oxide, conductive polymer, graphene, and other sensing materials ). For example, Cheng et al fabricated a fiber conductor composed of moss-inspired gold nanowires and styrene-ethylenebutylene-styrene, which can be incorporated into a garment to exhibit the potential in wearable textile electronics .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a human–computer interaction occurs, the force acting on the tactile sensor often changes constantly in space and time. In other words, the dynamic tactile process requires a four-dimensional (4D) detection, which necessitates the time dimension. , However, the increase in the time dimension significantly increases the difficulty in designing and fabricating tactile sensors. The size of the detection unit for typical piezoresistive matrix tactile sensors may be in the millimeter range. , This is highly unfavorable for high-resolution tactile sensing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the dynamic tactile process requires a four-dimensional (4D) detection, which necessitates the time dimension. , However, the increase in the time dimension significantly increases the difficulty in designing and fabricating tactile sensors. The size of the detection unit for typical piezoresistive matrix tactile sensors may be in the millimeter range. , This is highly unfavorable for high-resolution tactile sensing. Only if the magnitude of the active unit is on the order of nanoscale or submicron can the sensitive sensor array unit be reduced to the micron level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%