2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early amniotomy after cervical ripening for induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, De Vivo and colleagues published a meta-analysis in 2020 (N = 1273 in 4 trials) that found a similar risk of cesarean birth associated with early amniotomy during IOL (defined as amniotomy after expulsion of a cervical catheter, greater than or equal to 3 cm dilatation, or a Bishop score of ≥5) compared with later rupture of membranes (31.1% vs 30.9%; RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.71-1.56). 59 Like the studies by Battarbee et al 58 and Bala et al, 57 De Vivo et al also found shorter labor durations in the early amniotomy group of approximately 5 hours (interval from IOL onset to birth: weighted mean difference, −4.95 h; 95% CI, −8.12 to −1.78). 59 Early amniotomy may advance labor process and shorten time to birth when used after moderate cervical ripening and in combination with oxytocin initiation, but the effect on cesarean birth rates is not consistent across studies.…”
Section: Amniotomymentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, De Vivo and colleagues published a meta-analysis in 2020 (N = 1273 in 4 trials) that found a similar risk of cesarean birth associated with early amniotomy during IOL (defined as amniotomy after expulsion of a cervical catheter, greater than or equal to 3 cm dilatation, or a Bishop score of ≥5) compared with later rupture of membranes (31.1% vs 30.9%; RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.71-1.56). 59 Like the studies by Battarbee et al 58 and Bala et al, 57 De Vivo et al also found shorter labor durations in the early amniotomy group of approximately 5 hours (interval from IOL onset to birth: weighted mean difference, −4.95 h; 95% CI, −8.12 to −1.78). 59 Early amniotomy may advance labor process and shorten time to birth when used after moderate cervical ripening and in combination with oxytocin initiation, but the effect on cesarean birth rates is not consistent across studies.…”
Section: Amniotomymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…59 Like the studies by Battarbee et al 58 and Bala et al, 57 De Vivo et al also found shorter labor durations in the early amniotomy group of approximately 5 hours (interval from IOL onset to birth: weighted mean difference, −4.95 h; 95% CI, −8.12 to −1.78). 59 Early amniotomy may advance labor process and shorten time to birth when used after moderate cervical ripening and in combination with oxytocin initiation, but the effect on cesarean birth rates is not consistent across studies. Women with increased BMI may not gain as much benefit in response to amniotomy compared with women with lower BMIespecially with early amniotomy.…”
Section: Amniotomymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Amniotomy appears to be most effective for increasing uterine activity and reducing the cesarean birth rate during induction of labor when the cervix is dilated at to at least 4 centimeters, 73,84 although recent evidence from a meta-analysis (N = 1273 in 4 trials) supported amniotomy as early as 3 centimeters cervical dilatation following cervical ripening as a safe and effective method of hastening induction of labor. 85 . What is the evidence on turning off synthetic oxytocin infusions after active labor is established to give women more freedom to move during contractions?…”
Section:  How Long Should I Continue To Use Cervical Ripening Methods During Induction Of Labor Before Starting Synthetic Oxytocin To Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, newer guidelines encourage cervical ripening for nulliparous individuals until a Bishop's score of 8 or higher is reached to help reduce CB for failed IOL, 32 which would likely increase the duration of the overall admission for IOL unless outpatient cervical ripening is used. Early amniotomy, in an effort to expedite IOL, has not been shown to reduce the risk of CB according to a recently published metaanalysis, 33 despite shortening the interval from admission to delivery. As practice changes occur that may increase elective IOL at earlier gestation, this study may serve as a point of comparison, and also prompt midwifery practices to examine their CB rates for late-term IOL and EM and work toward lowering CB rates through IOL management optimization as needed.…”
Section: Labor Induction and Cesarean Birth In Context Of Midwifery Model Of Carementioning
confidence: 99%