2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early electrophysiological markers of atypical language processing in prematurely born infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
4
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Amongst all aspects of poor outcome in preterm infants, language development is commonly impaired (2). Previous studies indicated that infants with poor language performance at school age show abnormalities in electrocortical signals already in the neonatal period (3,6). Mehta et al showed that abnormalities in conventional EEG are present in 64.5% of infants with speech and language impairment (5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Amongst all aspects of poor outcome in preterm infants, language development is commonly impaired (2). Previous studies indicated that infants with poor language performance at school age show abnormalities in electrocortical signals already in the neonatal period (3,6). Mehta et al showed that abnormalities in conventional EEG are present in 64.5% of infants with speech and language impairment (5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Event-related potentials are small parts of continuous electroencephalography recordings, which are evoked in response to stimuli and have been shown to be valuable in studying language processing or development and to predict literacy precursor skills. Paquette et al reported that electrophysiological indicators, such as auditory event-related potentials and mismatch negativity, could be used in the neonatal period to predict atypical language processing later in life (3). So far, few studies investigated whether event-related potentials could be used to detect or predict cognitive impairments in preterm born infants and at present this method has not been applied in clinical practice in the neonatal period (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference of neurological development between preterm and full-term infants can be assessed in an objective way and at an early age by means of brain magnetic resonance imaging, in which different patterns of brain activity are observed, showing delayed maturation of several brain regions (15) , and the assessment of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (16,17) , which are considered early physiological markers, indicating which children may have language development disorders in the future (16) . Behavioral tests / scales are also widely used to assess and monitor the neuropsychomotor and linguistic development of preterm infants in tertiary referral hospitals, enabling early detection of changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, to further understand the origin of reading difficulties in children born preterm and their neural basis, the results should be interpreted in light of studies reporting delayed event‐related potentials and mismatch negativity responses to speech sounds in 3‐month old children born preterm. It has been suggested that these measures can be used for the early identification of the risk of language impairment …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that these measures can be used for the early identification of the risk of language impairment. 3 One strength of this study is that both fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity results are reported. These measures are related but different, and so reporting both gives a fuller picture of the neural bases underlying pre-reading skills.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%