2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early-stage invasive ductal carcinoma: Association of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient values with axillary lymph node metastasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
16
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluating the status of axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) is essential in deciding appropriate treatment and staging as well as predicting the long-term survival in breast cancer [3]. Although significant progress has been made in the genetic and molecular characterization of breast malignant lesions, axillary lymph node involvement is the single most important prognostic variable [47]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating the status of axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) is essential in deciding appropriate treatment and staging as well as predicting the long-term survival in breast cancer [3]. Although significant progress has been made in the genetic and molecular characterization of breast malignant lesions, axillary lymph node involvement is the single most important prognostic variable [47]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using such data, recent studies have focused on identifying MRI biomarkers that predict breast cancer prognosis. Earlier reports have shown that the ADC is associated with well‐established prognostic factors, including tumor size, histological grade, axillary lymph node status, and hormone receptor status . Furthermore, Mori et al recently found a significant correlation between the ADC and Ki‐67 status, which also predicts outcomes, in patients with luminal‐type breast cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Earlier reports have shown that the ADC is associated with well-established prognostic factors, including tumor size, histological grade, axillary lymph node status, and hormone receptor status. 11,12 Furthermore, Mori et al 13 recently found a significant correlation between the ADC and Ki-67 status, which also predicts outcomes, in patients with luminal-type breast cancer. However, the results of previous studies on the relationships between perfusion parameters derived from DCE-MRI and prognostic factors (especially the Ki-67 index) have been inconsistent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several studies have compared diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on MRI with various pathological findings and biomarkers of breast cancer [11][12][13][14]. Several reports showed that the ADC values of breast lesions in patients with positive axillary LN metastasis were significantly lower than those with negative axillary LN metastasis [14][15][16]. In these previous studies, the mean ADC values of the lesion were used in the evaluations [11][12][13][14][15][16], however, the usefulness of the minimum ADC value was recently recognized for differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses [17], detecting invasive components in ductal carcinoma in situ [18], and distinguishing breast cancer subtypes [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports showed that the ADC values of breast lesions in patients with positive axillary LN metastasis were significantly lower than those with negative axillary LN metastasis [14][15][16]. In these previous studies, the mean ADC values of the lesion were used in the evaluations [11][12][13][14][15][16], however, the usefulness of the minimum ADC value was recently recognized for differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses [17], detecting invasive components in ductal carcinoma in situ [18], and distinguishing breast cancer subtypes [19]. According to Hirano et al, sensitivity and specificity of the minimum ADC values were higher than those of the mean ADC values for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%