Earth Observation and Cloud Computing in Support of Two Sustainable Development Goals for the River Nile Watershed Countries

Abstract

In September 2015, the members of United Nations adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with universal applicability of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets. The SDGs are consequential for the development of the countries in the Nile watershed, which are affected by water scarcity and experiencing rapid urbanization associated with population growth. Earth Observation (EO) has become an important tool to monitor the progress and implementation of specific SDG targets through its wide accessibility and global coverage. In addition, the advancement of algorithms and tools deployed in cloud computing platforms provide an equal opportunity to use EO for developing countries with limited technological capacity. This study applies EO and cloud computing in support of the SDG 6 “clean water and sanitation” and SDG 11 “sustainable cities and communities” in the seven Nile watershed countries through investigations of EO data related to indicators of water stress (Indicator 6.4.2) and urbanization and living conditions (Indicators 11.3.1 and 11.1.1), respectively. Multiple approaches including harmonic, time series and correlational analysis are used to assess and evaluate these indicators. In addition, a contemporary deep-learning classifier, fully convolution neural networks (FCNN), was trained to classify the percentage of impervious surface areas. The results show the spatial and temporal water recharge pattern among different regions in the Nile watershed, as well as the urbanization in selected cities of the region. It is noted that the classifier trained from the developed countries (i.e., the United States) is effective in identifying modern communities yet limited in monitoring rural and slum regions.

An Assessment of the Filling Process of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and Its Impact on the Downstream Countries

“…The SRTM was an international collaboration by NASA in 2000 to map a complete near-global high-resolution data of Earth's elevation [14]. This one-time mission mapped the topography of the Earth's surface using radar interferometry through a two-antenna setup onboard satellite.…”

An Assessment of the Hydrological Trends Using Synergistic Approaches of Remote Sensing and Model Evaluations over Global Arid and Semi-Arid Regions

“…Following the methods in [38,39], harmonic analysis was applied to show a yearly trend followed by precipitation, ET and surface soil moisture in global drylands from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019 using monthly values (units in mm). The units of SSM/ET outputs from FLDAS and GLDAS products were also transformed into mm to compare with MODIS products.…”

“…Such expansion of big data revolutionized our understanding of the Earth system, while posing a higher request for advances in data management and processing capability. Accordingly, increasing the availability of cloud-based computing and analytical platforms, such as Amazon Web Service (AWS) and Google Earth Engine [34], is being widely used for dryland research [35][36][37][38][39][40]. Using the tools within Google Earth Engine, it was found that global dryland tree cover was significantly underrated and recent estimates exceeded previous ones by over 40% [41].…”

Title: Employing Earth Observations and Artificial Intelligence to Address Key Global Environmental Challenges in Service of the SDGs

“…In recent years, there has been an emerging increase in high-performance cloud computing platforms, such as the NASA Earth Exchange (NEX), Amazon Web Service (AWS) and Google Earth Engine (GEE) [15]. GEE is widely used for the environmental research in the Nile watershed and adjacent regions [10,[16][17][18][19][20]. It is characterized as an easily accessible and user-friendly frontend platform providing a convenient environment for interactive data representation and algorithm development.…”

“…For the purpose of finding the relationship between Chl-a and NPP for each model, we developed correlation maps that show the standard correlation using the Pearson correlation coefficient (7) in the range from −1 (anti-correlation) to +1 (perfect correlation), between these two monthly time series x and y, with N elements as: (19) with Cov being the covariance function, 0̅ and ;the average and 6 @ and 6 A the standard deviations for x and y, respectively.…”