1980
DOI: 10.3354/meps002091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological and Evolutionary Significance of Nutritional Flexibility in Planktotrophic Larvae of the Deep Sea Red Crab Geryon quinquedens and the Stone Crab (Menippe mercenaria)

Abstract: Larvae of crab species inhabiting the shallow water marine environment show a wide range in nutritional requirements that must be satisfied via the diet. The present study compares the dietary requirements of larvae of the deep sea red crab Geryon quinquedens Smith with those of the stone crab Menjppe mercenaria Say, a shallow water species. Stone crab larvae cannot survive to metamorphosis on a rotifer diet. Red crab larvae show no difference in survival to metamorphosis on rotifer and brine shrimp nauplius d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are partially utilised during embryogenesis, with varying amounts remaining available as an energy reserve for early planktonic larvae, and larger reserves remaining at hatching in the WL (Paschke 1998). Hence, Crangon crangon produces nutritionally less vulnerable (or nutritionally more flexible; for concepts, see Sulkin 1978, Sulkin & van Heukelem 1980, Staton & Sulkin 1991 larvae in winter and early spring, when plankton production is on average low or unpredictable. As a consequence, successful larval development may also occur under poor nutritional conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are partially utilised during embryogenesis, with varying amounts remaining available as an energy reserve for early planktonic larvae, and larger reserves remaining at hatching in the WL (Paschke 1998). Hence, Crangon crangon produces nutritionally less vulnerable (or nutritionally more flexible; for concepts, see Sulkin 1978, Sulkin & van Heukelem 1980, Staton & Sulkin 1991 larvae in winter and early spring, when plankton production is on average low or unpredictable. As a consequence, successful larval development may also occur under poor nutritional conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, knowledge of critical points in initial feeding may aid in maximising larval survival and metamorphosis in both research cultivation (see Kinne 1977) and aquaculture of commercially exploited species. In crustacean larvae, both the PNR and the PRS can be quantified experimentally to characterise the 'nutritional vulnerability' (Sulkin 1978) or 'nutritional flexibility' (Sulkin & van Heukelem 1980). Since these measurements of larval starvation resistance should vary with the general level of larval fitness (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rather good development in early larval stages (see above) and in small species (Broad, 1957a;Simon, 1979) suggest that algal cell (or chain) size relative to larval size, morphology (mouth parts), and behavioural traits are determinant factors for the suitability of phytoptankton as a food source. The same is probably true for small zooplankton such as rotifers (Brick, 1974;Sulkin & Norman, 1976;Sulkin, 1978;Anger & Nair, 1979;Sulkin & van Heukelem, 1980). Particularly positive rearing results with mixed diets (Regnault, 1969a;Ingle & Rice, 1971;Sandifer, 1972;Christiansen & Yang, 1976;Manzi et al, 1977) show, however, that qualitative (biochemical) aspects are also very important in larval nutrition.…”
Section: Foodmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition to needing a source of energy to sustain metabolism, most species must obtain specific nutrients from the diet to maximize survival and development rate (Sulkin & van Heukelem 1980, Levine & Sulkin 1984.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%