2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological implications of traditional livestock husbandry and associated land use practices: A case study from the trans-Himalaya, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in other livestock feeding systems in India, goats are also recipients for larger amounts of crop residues (e.g. in Himachal Pradesh, India, with 14.3 and 5.8% of the cool season diets of goats and cattle, respectively; Chandrasekhar et al, 2007), which suggests that the present findings are rather due to traditions in the study area than reflecting animal-related feeding preferences. Long-term storage of crop residues or other feeds, not yet common in the study area, could help reducing pressure on woody plant resources.…”
Section: Pasture Management and Livestock Husbandrymentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in other livestock feeding systems in India, goats are also recipients for larger amounts of crop residues (e.g. in Himachal Pradesh, India, with 14.3 and 5.8% of the cool season diets of goats and cattle, respectively; Chandrasekhar et al, 2007), which suggests that the present findings are rather due to traditions in the study area than reflecting animal-related feeding preferences. Long-term storage of crop residues or other feeds, not yet common in the study area, could help reducing pressure on woody plant resources.…”
Section: Pasture Management and Livestock Husbandrymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…For this calculation it was assumed that forage supply was not limiting intake and that the total quantity ingested would be similar to that observed in Chandrasekhar et al (2007), i.e. 1.1 and 5.4 kg of oven-dry forage/ day consumed by goats and cattle at average body weights of 31 kg and 190 kg, respectively.…”
Section: Data Processing and Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmentalist (2008) 28:429-445 441 Second, labour productivity/net economic returns from the tank-based ICS is lower than the other traditional land-uses like the HGS. Government support to canal-based irrigation systems innovated by local communities in other regions of the Indian Himalaya (Rao and Saxena 1994;Chandrasekhar et al 2007) are likely to be more useful than that to the present tank-based irrigation system. Replacement of traditional crops by altogether new cash crops as a means of economic development (Midmore et al 1996;Semwal et al 2004) is not visible in the study village possibly because farmers are likely to turn to modern inputs only when they have exhausted the potential of their traditional methods (Abdoulaye and Lowenberg-DeBoer 2000).…”
Section: Diospyros Montanamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most of the old human settlements are on the southern slope, it is easier to bring their livestock to the pastures on the southern slope. A. naviculare is not a preferred species for livestock, but it is frequently browsed by goat and sheep, because latter two animals are non-selective in foraging (Chandrashekhar et al 2007). Trampling damage is, however, more important than browsing.…”
Section: Habitat Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, in most sites, A. naviculare was found associated with thorny and sclerophyllous species (Table 1) which reduces the chances of damages by livestock and collection by human. These thorny species are generally excluded by large animals such as cow, yak and dzomos with wide mouth (Chandrashekhar et al 2007). In the sites of high grazing pressure such as Ice lake area, Manang hill, Khangsar, Yak Kharka and Thorong Phedi, A. naviculare is virtually absent in open areas and is exclusively confined in the bushes of the thorny and sclerophyllous species.…”
Section: Habitat Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%