2008
DOI: 10.1134/s1067413608020057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological monitoring of urban groups of stray dogs: An example of the city of petrozavodsk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the odds of sighting a de-sexed FRD in industrial (OR 0.7, p-value = 0.01) and administrative (OR 0.2, p-value <0.001) survey tracks was lower compared to residential sectors. Interestingly, this finding is similar to the study in the city of Petrozavodsk, Russia, where the number of stray dogs forming groups in industrial zones was higher than in residential areas where most dogs were solitary [42]. This was believed to be linked with the presence of secluded breeding dens and fewer instances of human interference restricting the formation of packs in these zones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that the odds of sighting a de-sexed FRD in industrial (OR 0.7, p-value = 0.01) and administrative (OR 0.2, p-value <0.001) survey tracks was lower compared to residential sectors. Interestingly, this finding is similar to the study in the city of Petrozavodsk, Russia, where the number of stray dogs forming groups in industrial zones was higher than in residential areas where most dogs were solitary [42]. This was believed to be linked with the presence of secluded breeding dens and fewer instances of human interference restricting the formation of packs in these zones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, the spatial frequency distribution of various sized groups in three of the tracks in rural Shirsuphal was not random, implying the tendency of FRD to form stable groups at these sites. A possible explanation for stable groups in rural Shirsuphal could have been the presence of lactating bitches (13%) and bitches in oestrous (6%) on these tracks [10,35,41,42], but the univariable analyses of the influence of gender over group sizes of FRD did not show any significant difference between the group forming tendency for male and female FRD ( Table 3). The FRD groupings in rural Shirsuphal can be attributed to individual preferences of the rural FRD to stay together rather than the need to form stable groups for hunting/sourcing food [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas ethological studies have a major statistical and quantitative component, the present study adopted an ethnographic and qualitative approach to examine the behavioral adjustment of dogs in an urban context. An ethological study [22] with an ethnographic component [23] had earlier been undertaken among dogs in a Russian city [24]. Such studies were taken as initial cases to understand dogs' spatial adjustment.…”
Section: Background: Research On Forms Of Canine Territorialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this urban context, the dogs who survived lived in a state of nonhuman dependency, exhibiting a less domesticated (or less tamed) social form (i.e., no learning imposed by humans). Consequently, whereas cities encourage anonymous and individualized lifestyles among humans [119], Concepción allowed these dogs to display all their (untamed) forms of sociability [10,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. We found that the territories of the different dogs could be almost perfectly superimposed onto the manmade city's territorial patterns, and the dogs exhibited a range of territorialities [120].…”
Section: Diverse Adaptations Of Dogs To Diverse Urban Morphologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La mayor probabilidad de observar jaurías en las torrenteras o en los botaderos es solo un ejemplo de cómo la ecología canina se entremezcla con el paisaje urbano para crear estructuras organizacionales en las jaurías, patrones de dispersión espacial, y variación en las densidades de las poblaciones caninas, que deben ser tomadas en cuenta para el manejo de canes (49) . Los perros son animales sociales, que crean jerarquías e interacciones complejas (50,51) . El sacrificio de perros vagabundos es seguido por una desorganización social de las jaurías que son total o parcialmente exterminadas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified