2016
DOI: 10.1111/cjag.12098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Analysis and Species at Risk: Lessons Learned and Future Challenges

Abstract: The Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA) has been in existence for 13 years. It was, and in many ways continues to be, controversial. The U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) originated in 1973 and has also been controversial. In the 1990s, concerns were raised by economists in Canada and the United States on the design of endangered species (ES) policy. Their concerns surrounded the reconsideration of the ESA and the establishment of SARA. What have we learned since the implementation of SARA over this time? How … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delays in the application of law perpetuates population declines and hinders recovery efforts. Adamowicz [57] underscored frequent delays in the response of industry or responsible agencies to species recovery. Boreal caribou were already considered as threatened in 2000 [9], and 15 years later, the critical habitat necessary for their recovery has been identified, but the national and most provincial recovery plans are late [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delays in the application of law perpetuates population declines and hinders recovery efforts. Adamowicz [57] underscored frequent delays in the response of industry or responsible agencies to species recovery. Boreal caribou were already considered as threatened in 2000 [9], and 15 years later, the critical habitat necessary for their recovery has been identified, but the national and most provincial recovery plans are late [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessments of trade‐offs between social, economic and environmental values and attributes underpin decision‐making in biodiversity conservation (Burgman & Yemshanov, 2013). While risk assessments play a vital role in preventing negative side effects of conservation actions (Kilpatrick, Gillin & Daszak, 2009), they rarely take into account potential conflict between different conservation programmes (Adamowicz, 2016). Here, we illustrate that, by integrating the identified ecological mechanisms of conflict into spatially explicit models, we can delineate areas at high risk of negative impacts from conflicting conservation programmes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Canada, species listed as endangered, threatened or extirpated under the Species at Risk Act (SARA) require recovery strategies outlining the steps needed to halt or reverse their decline. SARA and most threatened species policies focus on critical habitat as the mechanism for recovery and tend to place less emphasis on other important influences such as invasive species or multispecies interactions (Adamowicz, 2016). Our study shows that the anticipated effects (positive or negative) of proposed recovery plans on non‐target species, natural communities or ecological processes should also be identified, as also suggested by the National Recovery Working Group (2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, however, the economic analyses undertaken to support SARA may be limited in scope. In particular, these analyses focus on estimation of local economic impacts 2 and the benefits of species recovery may be ignored (Adamowicz, 2016). In addition, it is not clear that the socioeconomic analyses undertaken to support SARA appropriately weigh the societal costs of listing.…”
Section: The Current Role Of Economics In Marine Protected Resources Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%