2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic and energy efficiency of salvaging biomass from wildfire burnt areas for bioenergy production in northwestern Ontario: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“… a Friesen ( 2013 ) b MacDonald et al ( 2012 ) c Average of Ralevic et al ( 2010 ), Ralevic ( 2013 ), Ryans and Cormier ( 2009 ), and Reynolds et al ( 2012 ) d Based on a weighted average cost for slashburning from Baxter ( 2010 ) e Average of Ralevic ( 2013 ), MacDonald et al ( 2012 ), Gautam et al ( 2010 ), and Kumar et al ( 2008 ) f Ralevic ( 2013 ), including grinding costs with pre-piling …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a Friesen ( 2013 ) b MacDonald et al ( 2012 ) c Average of Ralevic et al ( 2010 ), Ralevic ( 2013 ), Ryans and Cormier ( 2009 ), and Reynolds et al ( 2012 ) d Based on a weighted average cost for slashburning from Baxter ( 2010 ) e Average of Ralevic ( 2013 ), MacDonald et al ( 2012 ), Gautam et al ( 2010 ), and Kumar et al ( 2008 ) f Ralevic ( 2013 ), including grinding costs with pre-piling …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomass currently requires fossil fuel combustion for its production, harvest, and supply; hence it would be a fallacy to simply identify bioenergy as emitting zero pollutants (Jing and Peidong 2011;Zhu et al 2011;Gautam et al 2010;Van Belle 2006). A wider approach including primary energy balances, CO 2 balances, transport modes, and distances would allow verifying if it is possible to transport biomass over long distances and still mitigate CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Replacement Of Fossil Fuels and Co 2 Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast CO 2 emission in biomass-based energy production is less than 58 kg/MW. In addition, the use of biomass for energy production purposes saves 5840 and 4240 kg of CO 2 emissions annually in comparison to heavy fuel oil and natural gas, accordingly [61,62]. For example, one small settlement in Finland saves/replaces approximately 1.9 million liters of oil annually and reduces carbon dioxide emissions by about five million kg annually, due to forest energy production [55].…”
Section: Swot Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%