2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic efficiency of two baling systems for sugarcane straw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, the straw was left on the field, but some authors recognized that the calorific value of the sugar cane straw could be used as biomass, in the same way as the sugar cane bagasse that is obtained from alcohol/sugar production 9,11 . Recent studies have assessed the collection of this by-product from the field 9,12 and new practices for burning it to produce energy 13 . However, after obtaining energy from the sugar cane straw by burning, waste is generated: sugar cane straw ash (SCSA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the straw was left on the field, but some authors recognized that the calorific value of the sugar cane straw could be used as biomass, in the same way as the sugar cane bagasse that is obtained from alcohol/sugar production 9,11 . Recent studies have assessed the collection of this by-product from the field 9,12 and new practices for burning it to produce energy 13 . However, after obtaining energy from the sugar cane straw by burning, waste is generated: sugar cane straw ash (SCSA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A enfardadora ST resultou no menor valor de rendimento de 2,42 ha h -1 , em relação ao equipamento com trituração frontal 3,23 ha h -1 . Esse valor é semelhante ao encontrado por Lemos et al (2014), em experimento utilizando uma enfardadora prismática sem triturador frontal onde o rendimento operacional apresentado foi de 2,23 ha h -1 , entretanto Gomes at al. (2016) também em avaliação de desempenho operacional de duas enfardadoras prismáticas sem triturador frontal obtiveram rendimentos de 3,46 ha h -1 .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A enfardadora ST resultou no menor valor de rendimento de 2,42 ha h -1 , em relação ao equipamento com trituração frontal 3,23 ha h -1 . Esse valor é semelhante ao encontrado por Lemos et al (2014), em experimento utilizando uma Agric., Botucatu, vol. 33, n.4, p.292-296, outubro-dezembro, 2018 A densidade dos fardos produzidos pela enfardadora CT apresentou valores ligeiramente superiores aos da enfardadora (ST), sendo apresentada uma densidade de 202,4 kg m³ -1 e 194,2 kg m³ -1 respectivamente.…”
Section: Os Valores De Consumo Divergiram Dos Obtidos Porunclassified