1995
DOI: 10.1016/0921-8009(95)00059-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
391
0
18

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 745 publications
(437 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
391
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the case of flow types of pollution, the presence or absence of a Kuznetian functional relationship between income and the indicator of a stock type of environmental quality like forest cover is not clear-cut in the literature (Arrow et al, 1995;Stern, et al, 1996;Ekins, 1997). The present available evidence is mixed, and it varies depending on the sets of countries and time periods selected for the study.…”
Section: Governance Economic Policy and The Environmental Kuznets Cmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike the case of flow types of pollution, the presence or absence of a Kuznetian functional relationship between income and the indicator of a stock type of environmental quality like forest cover is not clear-cut in the literature (Arrow et al, 1995;Stern, et al, 1996;Ekins, 1997). The present available evidence is mixed, and it varies depending on the sets of countries and time periods selected for the study.…”
Section: Governance Economic Policy and The Environmental Kuznets Cmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Arrow, et al (1995) offered their opinion of the EKC relationship for a stock resource like forests. They asserted that, "An inverted-U relationship has been shown for emissions of pollutants, but is not feasible for stock resources like forest ecosystems.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first addresses the scale of human action in relation to the capacity of the Earth to sustain it, a significant feature of the ecological economics research agenda (Costanza 1991), drawing on work on the essential role of the life-support environment for human wellbeing (Odum 1989, Vitousek et al 1997 and biophysical constraints for the expansion of the economic subsystem (Boulding 1966, Arrow et al 1995. The second is the work on understanding essential Earth System processes (Bretherton 1988, Schellnhuber 1999, Steffen et al 2004, including human actions Munn 1986, Turner et al 1990), brought together in the evolution of global change research towards Earth System science and in the development of sustainability science (Clark and Dickson 2003).…”
Section: Box 1 Summary Of Criteria and Process For The Identificatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current perspectives and worldviews mentally disconnect human progress and economic growth from the biosphere (Arrow et al 1995;O'Brien 2009) and the life-supporting environment, 2 if not simply ignored, has become external to society with people and nature treated as two separate entities. We still seldom account for changes in the capacity of natural capital to sustain human wellbeing in measurements of progress like GDP or the human development index and tend to treat the environment as a sector in policy and decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%