Economic Value of Data and Analytics for Health Care Providers: Hermeneutic Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Background The benefits of data and analytics for health care systems and single providers is an increasingly investigated field in digital health literature. Electronic health records (EHR), for example, can improve quality of care. Emerging analytics tools based on artificial intelligence show the potential to assist physicians in day-to-day workflows. Yet, single health care providers also need information regarding the economic impact when deciding on potential adoption of these tools. Objective This paper examines the question of whether data and analytics provide economic advantages or disadvantages for health care providers. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview including a variety of technologies beyond computer-based patient records. Ultimately, findings are also intended to determine whether economic barriers for adoption by providers could exist. Methods A systematic literature search of the PubMed and Google Scholar online databases was conducted, following the hermeneutic methodology that encourages iterative search and interpretation cycles. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to 165 initially identified studies, 50 were included for qualitative synthesis and topic-based clustering. Results The review identified 5 major technology categories, namely EHRs (n=30), computerized clinical decision support (n=8), advanced analytics (n=5), business analytics (n=5), and telemedicine (n=2). Overall, 62% (31/50) of the reviewed studies indicated a positive economic impact for providers either via direct cost or revenue effects or via indirect efficiency or productivity improvements. When differentiating between categories, however, an ambiguous picture emerged for EHR, whereas analytics technologies like computerized clinical decision support and advanced analytics predominantly showed economic benefits. Conclusions The research question of whether data and analytics create economic benefits for health care providers cannot be answered uniformly. The results indicate ambiguous effects for EHRs, here representing data, and mainly positive effects for the significantly less studied analytics field. The mixed results regarding EHRs can create an economic barrier for adoption by providers. This barrier can translate into a bottleneck to positive economic effects of analytics technologies relying on EHR data. Ultimately, more research on economic effects of technologies other than EHRs is needed to generate a more reliable evidence base.

Business Intelligence Transformation Through Ai and Data Analytics

“…Studies that provided insights into the economic value and practical applications of AI and Data Analytics in various business sectors were also included. This was in line with the approach taken by Von Wedel and Hagist (2020), who conducted a hermeneutic systematic literature review focusing on the economic value of data and analytics in healthcare, demonstrating the importance of including studies assessing technological innovations' economic impact. Exclusion criteria were applied to filter out studies that did not directly relate to the core themes of AI, Data Analytics, and BI.…”

Electronic health records in nursing from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis

“…EHR can make it easier for researchers to access and aggregate clinical data. The application of EHR in clinical nursing can reduce medication errors, improve patient medication compliance, and reduce nurses' work burden ( 2 , 4 ). In addition, researchers are paying more and more attention to the potential of EHR.…”

Predicting Patient Length of Stay Using Artificial Intelligence to Assist Healthcare Professionals in Resource Planning and Scheduling Decisions

“…Healthcare providers reported that Electronic Healthcare Records (EHR) systems help enhance communication, eliminate redundancy in the delivery of care, and allow quick access to critical information (Silow-Carroll et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2019). As a result, EHR systems enable providers to become more efficient in delivering care and reduce unnecessary hospital stays (Thompson et al, 2006;Von Wedel & Hagist, 2020). Some healthcare practitioners are concerned that reducing hospital length of stay (LOS) may lead to higher rates of readmissions and mortality; however, recent studies show that there is no significant correlation between LOS and readmission and mortality rates and that a longer LOS does not necessarily mean better quality of care (Kaboli et al, 2012).…”