2017
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial: Embodying the Self: Neurophysiological Perspectives on the Psychopathology of Anomalous Bodily Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, cortical motor areas are not only motor-centric; they possess sensory properties, responding not only to micro-stimulation-inducing movement but also to visual, tactile, and auditory stimuli. These neurons display embodied motor simulation, indicated when visual, tactile, or auditory stimuli are presented within the peri-personal space associated with the body part controlled by the neurons [39]. Premotor area F4 includes neurons that are responsible for controlling arm reaching and orienting movements of the hand.…”
Section: The Built Environment and Embodied Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, cortical motor areas are not only motor-centric; they possess sensory properties, responding not only to micro-stimulation-inducing movement but also to visual, tactile, and auditory stimuli. These neurons display embodied motor simulation, indicated when visual, tactile, or auditory stimuli are presented within the peri-personal space associated with the body part controlled by the neurons [39]. Premotor area F4 includes neurons that are responsible for controlling arm reaching and orienting movements of the hand.…”
Section: The Built Environment and Embodied Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De este modo, Blanke, (2012) afirma que la representación del cuerpo se inserta como un concepto complejo (embodied body) que involucra la integración multi y somatosensorial, el procesamiento visual, auditivo-vestibular, así como las señales motoras y viscerales del sistema nervioso autónomo. En este sentido, Hanna & Thompson (2003) proponen distinguir entre la experiencia del propio cuerpo y el cuerpo físico, es decir, diferenciar entre el cuerpo sujeto y el cuerpo objeto, en tanto, el primero corresponde a la vivencia o experiencia que cada persona tiene sobre su cuerpo, mientras que el segundo responde al estudio o perspectiva que un tercero tiene sobre el cuerpo del otro, tal como lo hacen disciplinas como la anatomía y la fisiología (Sestito, Raballo, Stanghellini & Gallese, 2017).En esta misma línea, Candini et al (2016) plantean que el reconocimiento del propio cuerpo resulta del procesamiento simultáneo de estímulos visuales, de las señales somato sensoriales y propioceptivas, así como de la información motora. Por lo tanto, conviene distinguir entre el conocimiento implícito y el conocimiento explícito sobre el cuerpo.…”
Section: Antecedentesunclassified
“…Both subjective and objective perspectives intersect in our own and others' perception and representation of healthy and ill bodies. To this effect, the significant gap observed between patients' reports of various types of bodily symptoms and illnesses, on the one hand, and etiopathogenetic theories and clinical diagnoses, on the other, is particularly concerning (Sestito et al 2017), given the influence of neurological reductionism and concurrent promissory rhetorics of recovery in approaches to mental illness, to the detriment of patient experiences and priorities (Reardon 2014). This disparity between patient reports and medical theories also maps onto larger ethical and epistemic concerns about the place given to the voices and experiences of those immediately affected by illness in medical discourse and the perceived legitimacy of their claims to suffering (Crichton, Carel, and Kidd 2017;Carel 2017, 2018).…”
Section: A Feminist Phenomenology Of Illnessmentioning
confidence: 99%