2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19061423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces Using Motor-Imagery: Techniques and Challenges

Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), particularly those using motor-imagery (MI) data, have the potential to become groundbreaking technologies in both clinical and entertainment settings. MI data is generated when a subject imagines the movement of a limb. This paper reviews state-of-the-art signal processing techniques for MI EEG-based BCIs, with a particular focus on the feature extraction, feature selection and classification techniques used. It also summarizes the main appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
295
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 422 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
4
295
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The most frequently used portable BCI devices are based on electroencephalography (EEG). Although EEG provides excellent temporal resolution, making it ideal for real-time applications, the technology suffers from poor spatial resolution and an inherent sensitivity to motion artifacts (Padfield et al, 2019). Motion artifacts can have an impact on the spectral content of EEG in the frequency range below 20 Hz and lead to large spikes in the signal that may be difficult to correct (Mihajlovic et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequently used portable BCI devices are based on electroencephalography (EEG). Although EEG provides excellent temporal resolution, making it ideal for real-time applications, the technology suffers from poor spatial resolution and an inherent sensitivity to motion artifacts (Padfield et al, 2019). Motion artifacts can have an impact on the spectral content of EEG in the frequency range below 20 Hz and lead to large spikes in the signal that may be difficult to correct (Mihajlovic et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies focused primarily on a few classes classification and non-intuitive tasks contained in BCI Competition IV data (left-hand, right-hand, foot, and tongue). However, intuitive MI is a practical BCI paradigm due to direct interaction between users and devices without artificial command matching [19]. To the best of our knowledge, these approaches have not achieved satisfactory classification performance on intuitive MI yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the process discussed in Section V-A to estimate the posterior intensity of a persistence diagram D in H given a training set Q Y , with the goal of identifying the correct class of D. We used the R package BayesTDA to obtain posterior intensities. Consequently, the probability density was obtained from (2). After computing the intensities with respect to the training sets from both of the classes, the Bayes factor was computed by (3) as the ratio of the posterior probability densities of the unknown persistence diagram D given each of the two competing training sets from Q Y or Q Y .…”
Section: Eeg Signal Classification With Bayesian Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%