2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EEG signal based classification before and after combined Yoga and Sudarshan Kriya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Hinterberger et al ( 2011 ) used a linear classifier and could classify subjects in distinct pre-induced meditation states, while Ahani et al ( 2013 , 2014 ) using the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm, associated EEG with respiration to discriminate whether stressed subjects engage or not in a 6-weeks intervention. In addition, Lee et al ( 2017 ) also used the SVM and an artificial neuronal network (ANN) based on spectral features to classify meditation expertise of focused breathing practitioners (CDM-FA), and Sharma et al ( 2019 ) employed ANN to differentiate meditators and non-meditators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hinterberger et al ( 2011 ) used a linear classifier and could classify subjects in distinct pre-induced meditation states, while Ahani et al ( 2013 , 2014 ) using the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm, associated EEG with respiration to discriminate whether stressed subjects engage or not in a 6-weeks intervention. In addition, Lee et al ( 2017 ) also used the SVM and an artificial neuronal network (ANN) based on spectral features to classify meditation expertise of focused breathing practitioners (CDM-FA), and Sharma et al ( 2019 ) employed ANN to differentiate meditators and non-meditators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental group showed an improvement in performance regarding the increased beta band complexity for non-linear features, which implies the effective use of cognitive resources during the task (Daniel et al, 2022). Sharma et al (2019) tested the effects of Sudarshan Kriya Yoga on the EEG and came to the same conclusion, indicating that the SKY breathing technique could possibly be used in clinical practice. Their study aimed to evaluate the effects of SKY on the human brain by means of EEG signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Pre-and post-electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were collected from control and test groups before and after 3 months of regular SKY practice. Their results showed that the values of variance, standard deviation, zero crossing, and maximum and minimum of EEG signals increased in the study group but decreased in the control group (Sharma et al, 2019). The study by Srinivasan and Baijal (2007) examined the effects of SKY practice on the Mismatch Negativity Paradigm (MMN), an indicator of preattentive processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meditation expertise increases through training and practice, and there will be both state and trait effects which can be characterized in either behavioral data or brain activities such as resting EEG for trait effect and meditating EEG for state effect ( Cahn and Polich, 2006 ; Zarka et al, 2022 ). There is lack of studies on classification of brain states for different training and practicing stages longitudinally for individual meditation practitioners, but some efforts have been spent on classifying subjects with different levels of meditation expertise using EEG in either the meditating states ( Shaw and Routray, 2016 ; Lee et al, 2017 ; Pandey and Miyapuram, 2021 ) or the resting states ( Sharma et al, 2019 ), as detailed in Table 6 , where the results of our study in this paper on meditation stage classification using meditation EEG (MBSR1/MBSR2) and resting state EEG (REST1/REST2), are also presented for ease of comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For meditation state/experience classification, the intra-subject classification strategy has been used in Panachakel et al (2021b) , the mix-subject classification strategy has been used in Ahani et al (2014) , Khoury et al (2015) , Shaw and Routray (2016) , Lee et al (2017) , Sharma et al (2019) , and Han et al (2020) , and the inter-subject classification strategy has been used in Panachakel et al (2021a , b) and Pandey and Miyapuram (2021) . The inter-subject classification strategy is most suitable for the general case but it is the most difficult due to inter-subject variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%