2012
DOI: 10.11606/issn.2318-3659.v49i2p111-115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito da influência de probiótico sobre a morfologia intestinal de codornas japonesas

Abstract: Na eclosão, o sistema digestório da ave está anatomicamente completo, mas a capacidade funcional não. Portanto, o trato intestinal sofrerá grandes alterações fisiológicas. Essas alterações irão proporcionar aumento na área de superfície, viabilizando a digestão e absorção 1 . Os processos de absorção são totalmente dependentes dos mecanismos que ocorrem na mucosa intestinal. A integridade das células que a compõem é de fundamental importância para a absorção dos nutrientes 2 .A mucosa intestinal é constituída … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…probiotic and/or betaglucan prebiotic at 1 to 7 days of age; those authors reported no group-wise difference in the parameters of the duodenum and jejunum in the small intestine. Bueno et al (2012) evaluated the influence of probiotic supplementation on the intestinal morphology of birds; they reported a significant treatment effect at 42 days of age in birds supplemented with probiotics, and the result of their study was confirmed in the later studies. Moreover, those authors reported that probiotic added in the diet caused a reduction of the duodenum CD as compared to that by a control diet without probiotic, which conflicts with the result of lower duodenum villus height in the control group without probiotic versus the treatment group with probiotics of Pelicano et al (2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…probiotic and/or betaglucan prebiotic at 1 to 7 days of age; those authors reported no group-wise difference in the parameters of the duodenum and jejunum in the small intestine. Bueno et al (2012) evaluated the influence of probiotic supplementation on the intestinal morphology of birds; they reported a significant treatment effect at 42 days of age in birds supplemented with probiotics, and the result of their study was confirmed in the later studies. Moreover, those authors reported that probiotic added in the diet caused a reduction of the duodenum CD as compared to that by a control diet without probiotic, which conflicts with the result of lower duodenum villus height in the control group without probiotic versus the treatment group with probiotics of Pelicano et al (2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, the amount of nutrients needed for enterocyte repair and the rates of nutrient digestion and absorption remained similar. Bueno et al (2012) observed a significant (P <0.05) interaction in probiotic treatment and bird age compared with unsupplemented control birds. In Japanese quail, supplementation with probiotics increased crypt depth at 7 days old but reduced it at 35 days old.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Moreover, herbal medicines (propolis), probiotics, symbiotics and organic acids are classi ed as performance-enhancing additives (Brasil, 2004) and it is notorious how these additives cannot express positive results due to the lack of sanitary challenge in poultry studies, in different experimental variables (Silva et al 2012;Bueno et al 2012;Bastos-Leite et al 2016). Because, good prophylactic conditions for raising animals and a minimum of stress (which is usually associated with nutritional, environmental or behavioral factors), do not present a su cient increase in bacteria to cause an imbalance in intestinal health, compromising productive performance (Fukayama et al 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%