Proteinuria may be produced in the experimental animal in a variety of ways. One of the simplest and most convenient methods is injection of the kidney enzyme, renin.Picketing and Prinzmetal (1) were the first to notice that proteinuria was increased following renin administration to the rabbit. Brandt and Gruhn (2) confirmed this finding, and by studying the simultaneous excretion of injected hemoglobin, concluded that renin does not significantly alter the glomerular permeability, but rather increases proteinuria by diminishing tubular reabsorption of protein from the glomerular filtrate. Shortly after this, Addis, Barrett, Boyd, and Ureen (3) discovered that renin produced an intense, though transient, proteinuria in the rat. Since inactivation of renin, with respect to its pressor effect, led to a loss of its capacity to induce proteinuria, and since repeated injections of renin, at suitable intervals, led to a diminution in the proteinuric as well as the pressor property of renin, these workers concluded that this form of proteinuria is dependent on the pressor action of renin. Rather and Addis (4) reported that the athrocytosis of simultaneously administered hemoglobin or bovine albumin by the cells lining the proximal convoluted tubule is not inhibited by renin, and stated that Brandt and Gruhn's hypothesis, that renin inhibits the tubular reabsorption of protein, is not supported by their experiments. More recently, Lippman, Ureen, and Oliver (5) have restudied the effect of renin on the excretion of injected hemoglobin. From a combination of morphological and functional data these workers conclude that renin causes an increase in glomerular permeability to hemoglobin and decreases the tubular reabsorption of this substance. Hence, conflicting views are expressed concerning the mechanism whereby renin produces an increased excretion of protein in the urine.