1991
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(1991)3:3(204)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Aggregate and Specimen Size on Fracture Properties of Dam Concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Ubiquitiformal fracture energy G uf for concrete: (a) Swartz and Kan (1992), (b) Saouma et al (1990Saouma et al ( , 1991, Saouma and Barton (1994) materials, because the relation for fracture toughness is derived from rationalistic deduction on the assumption of linear elasticity. It seems now that the above mentioned discrepancy can be reasonably explained based on the ubiquitiformal fracture energy as follows.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. Ubiquitiformal fracture energy G uf for concrete: (a) Swartz and Kan (1992), (b) Saouma et al (1990Saouma et al ( , 1991, Saouma and Barton (1994) materials, because the relation for fracture toughness is derived from rationalistic deduction on the assumption of linear elasticity. It seems now that the above mentioned discrepancy can be reasonably explained based on the ubiquitiformal fracture energy as follows.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate numerically the properties of the ubiquitiform fracture energy, concrete materials presented in Swartz and Kan (1992) as well as by Saouma et al (1990Saouma et al ( , 1991 and Saouma and Barton (1994) are used. The corresponding material properties as well as the calculated values of δ min from Eq.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average values reported in these tables for G lc computed by the direct energy method are for beams with a ratio of crack length divided by height of beam less than or equal to 0.65. Tables B-3 Saouma, Broz, Bruhwiler, and Boggs (1991) study were used in this study. One of the unique aspects of this testing program is that concrete specimens with maximum size aggregate consistent with the size used in some dams and locks were included in the testing program.…”
Section: B3 Refai and Swartz (1988) Three-point Beam Bending Test Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While standard Hopkinson bars with a diameter in the range of 10-20 mm are sufficient for dynamic testing of fine-grained materials, like steel, larger bars are needed to load concrete specimens of meaningful size. In fact, the specimen size for concrete should be larger than four times the maximum aggregate size (as a rule-of-thumb), in order for a representative volume of material to be tested [18]. The material and the dimension of the bar have also to satisfy the appropriate conditions in order for the one-dimensional theory of wave propagation to be applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%