2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of annealing treatment on CdS/CIGS thin film solar cells depending on different CdS deposition temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be explained by the grain size of the layer which is under the CdS film. The d-spacing value of the highest intensity CdS peak equals 0.335 nm (Table 4) was found to be similar to the results obtained by Lee et al [40] with the CBD method. The lattice mismatch of the obtained heterojunction is very small, which creates preferable conditions for CIGS-based device fabrication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It can be explained by the grain size of the layer which is under the CdS film. The d-spacing value of the highest intensity CdS peak equals 0.335 nm (Table 4) was found to be similar to the results obtained by Lee et al [40] with the CBD method. The lattice mismatch of the obtained heterojunction is very small, which creates preferable conditions for CIGS-based device fabrication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the short‐circuit current density ( J sc ) in the CZTS cells was insufficiently high (17.3 mA/cm 2 ). Four main factors contribute to the low J sc value: (i) a high positive conduction‐band offset (CBO) at the interface between the buffer and CZTS layers ; (ii) increased interface recombination at the interface between the buffer and the CZTS layers , (iii) a low external quantum efficiency (EQE) for short‐wavelength light because of absorption losses caused by the CdS buffer layer ; and (iv) a low EQE for long‐wavelength light because of the low diffusion length of minority carriers (low mobility and/or low life time of excited electrons) . However, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), pump/probe ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS), and UPS/inverse photoelectron spectroscopy have previously revealed that the CBO value at the interface between the CdS and CZTS layers can lead to high‐performance cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBD additionally takes advantage over ALD by its non-vacuum, large-area deposition capability, which makes CBD preferable for the industry. Hence, CBD has become regarded as the most robust industrial deposition method for CIGS buffer layer for decades [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Nonetheless, CBD suffers from issues such as poor crystallinity, high concentration of impurities, and requirements for post process, waste liquid treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%