1982
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(82)82183-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Calcium Buffers and Whole Plant Processing on Starch Digestibility of Sorghum Based Diets in Holstein Cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A linear relationship between faecal NDF concentration and aTTD of NDF was observed using only one faecal spot sample (R 2 = 0.70, P = 0.04; data not shown). Fernandez et al (1982) predicted aTTD from faecal starch for lactating cows fed high-starch diets (mean = 34% of DM) in which sorghum grain and silage were the only starch sources (aTTD of starch (%) = 108.8% − (1.82 × FS%); n = 16, R 2 = 0.64). More recently, other linear relationships between faecal starch and aTTD of starch in lactating cows (mean = 27% starch DM) were derived with the following equations: aTTD of starch (%) = 98.7% − 1.76 × FS%; n = 72, R 2 = 0.73; P < 0.01 (Ferguson 2006, as referenced by Grant 2010); aTTD of starch (%) = 100.0% − (1.25 × FS%); n = 506, R 2 = 0.94, P < 0.01 (Ferraretto and Shaver 2012); and aTTD of starch (%) = 100.0% − (1.25 × FS%); n = 564, R 2 = 0.94; P < 0.001 (Fredin et al 2014).…”
Section: Accuracy Of Using Faecal Nutrients To Predict Apparent Totalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A linear relationship between faecal NDF concentration and aTTD of NDF was observed using only one faecal spot sample (R 2 = 0.70, P = 0.04; data not shown). Fernandez et al (1982) predicted aTTD from faecal starch for lactating cows fed high-starch diets (mean = 34% of DM) in which sorghum grain and silage were the only starch sources (aTTD of starch (%) = 108.8% − (1.82 × FS%); n = 16, R 2 = 0.64). More recently, other linear relationships between faecal starch and aTTD of starch in lactating cows (mean = 27% starch DM) were derived with the following equations: aTTD of starch (%) = 98.7% − 1.76 × FS%; n = 72, R 2 = 0.73; P < 0.01 (Ferguson 2006, as referenced by Grant 2010); aTTD of starch (%) = 100.0% − (1.25 × FS%); n = 506, R 2 = 0.94, P < 0.01 (Ferraretto and Shaver 2012); and aTTD of starch (%) = 100.0% − (1.25 × FS%); n = 564, R 2 = 0.94; P < 0.001 (Fredin et al 2014).…”
Section: Accuracy Of Using Faecal Nutrients To Predict Apparent Totalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cereal grains are a major ingredient in many cattle diets, and given the high proportion of starch in grains, predictions have been developed to estimate starch digestibility. For example, faecal starch concentration can be used as a predictor of apparent total tract digestion (aTTD) of starch in feedlot (Zinn et al 2002(Zinn et al , 2007Corona et al 2005) and dairy cattle (Fernandez et al 1982;Fredin et al 2014). In addition, indigestible markers such as lignin can be used to monitor nutrient digestibility, but knowledge of the concentration of the marker and the nutrient of interest in both the feed and faeces is required (Van Soest et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the starch digestibility in dairy cows varies from 70% to 100% and is affected by multiple factors. Fernandez et al [85] reported a relationship between starch digestibility and FS for dairy cows, confirmed by Fredin et al [86] that used NIRS to predict FS in dried ground fecal samples using Foss-NIR System 6500 (Silver Spring, MD). The FS concentration was predicted with good precision for the various spectral mathematical transformations, with high coefficients of determination (R 2 > 0.83) and a low standard error of prediction (SEP = 0.78-0.57) (Figure 4).…”
Section: Diet Digestibility Estimation By Nirsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The FS concentration was predicted with good precision for the various spectral mathematical transformations, with high coefficients of determination (R 2 > 0.83) and a low standard error of prediction (SEP = 0.78-0.57) (Figure 4). The high correspondence between the concentration of FS on dry matter basis and the digestibility of the total starch in dairy cows has been demonstrated [84][85][86]. However, when FS was greater than 5%, the NIRS rating was reduced.…”
Section: Diet Digestibility Estimation By Nirsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.8-cineol (5.6-10.8%), terpinol-4 (3,1-4,9%) e piperitona (2,2-3,3%), apresentaram efeito miorrelaxante ou blocagem absoluto da contractabilidade espontânea em fibras de músculo liso de rumen e abomaso (Jalilzadeh-Amin et al, 2012 São poucos os trabalhos que avaliaram os efeitos das AMC sobre a digestibilidade dos diferentes nutrientes, no entanto, devido à grande proporção de calcário na composição desta, é possível tentar relacionar os resultados obtidos com a suplementação do calcário sobre esta variável. Fernandez et al (1982), Nocek et al (1983) e Rogers et al (1985) demostraram que a suplementação de carbonato de cálcio na dieta de vacas leiteiras não melhorou a digestibilidade do amido. Clark et al (1989) tampouco observaram diferenças significativas sobre a digestibilidade aparente da MS, MO, PB e EE quando suplementou vacas leiteiras com calcário.…”
Section: Pastagemunclassified