2020
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2019-308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of differences in the type of restoration and adhesive resin cement system on the bonding of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations

Abstract: The effect of differences in the type of restoration and adhesive resin cement system on the bonding of CAD/CAM ceramic restoration after cyclic loading was examined quantitatively and qualitatively. Seventy-two human maxillary first molars were divided into three restoration groups: MOD-inlay, MODP-onlay, and crown. Immediate dentin sealing was applied to the exposed dentin of all prepared specimens. The 24 specimens of each restoration group were further divided into another three groups, and a different adh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 In fact, very little studies tested the microtensile bond strength in inlays evaluating the bond strength obtained with the intra-cavity walls. 19 Class I cavities employed in the present study are known to suffer from the adverse effect of configuration factor (C-factor), this factor is known to cause stresses within the cement layer as a result of cement shrinkage after polymerization. 12 Such stresses could affect the bond strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 In fact, very little studies tested the microtensile bond strength in inlays evaluating the bond strength obtained with the intra-cavity walls. 19 Class I cavities employed in the present study are known to suffer from the adverse effect of configuration factor (C-factor), this factor is known to cause stresses within the cement layer as a result of cement shrinkage after polymerization. 12 Such stresses could affect the bond strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The quantitative μTBS test was employed in the present study, as it is believed to provide easy to understand data that can be simply related to the bond strength. 19 It was used rather than shear bond strength test, as it was claimed that the small size of the tested specimens produced more favorable stress distribution during testing, allowing the resulting failure to be closer to their true ultimate values. 16 Based on the results of the present study, the null hypothesis was rejected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the base plane of the mold, the teeth were placed in acrylic-cylindrical molds (15 mm of inner diameter) using self-curing resin (Ostron II, GC, Tokyo, Japan), and the height of the tooth, the distance between the occlusal plane and the base plane of the mold, was set to 25 mm. A 2-mm depth of cross-shaped cavity ( Figure 1 ) was prepared in the center of the tooth using a cavity duplication machine (prototype device, Tokyo Giken, Tokyo, Japan) [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ] with a diamond point (123, Horico Dental, Berlin, Germany). Then, dentin undercuts were prepared using an inverted cone bur (653-002, Tokyo Dental Industrial, Tokyo, Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SE2 primer was first applied to dentin surfaces for 20 s and air dried. Then, the bonding agent of SE2 was spread, gently air-dried and light cured for 10 s. Afterwards, ES flow was daubed thinly on SE2 applied dentin surfaces with a disposable applicator brush 5,10,17,18) (3L orange, Sun Medical, Shiga, Japan) and light-cured for 20 s. Then resin-coated dentin surfaces were wiped with alcohol pellets. The thickness of resin-coating layer was checked by confocal laser scanning microscopy (VK-X150, Keyence, Osaka, Japan) observation of perpendicular cut specimen in preliminary experiment.…”
Section: Mtbs Testmentioning
confidence: 99%