2008
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2009.35.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Feed Restriction Regimes During the Starter Stage on Productivity and Carcass Characteristics of Male and Female Ross 308 Broiler Chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
26
2
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
26
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Feed conversion ratio at the end of fattening was lower in experimental groups (1.64 to 1.67), compared with control (1.69), which is in compliance with the results by Shalmany and Shivazad (2006), who also recorded a decrease of FCR after the application of propolis extract in the diet of chickens Ross 308. The results of FCR are comparable with values achieved by Haščík et al (2010), but Novel et al (2009) found the FCR in 42-days old chickens at the level of 2.20 to 2.30. Inconclusive differences (P ≥ 0.05) in FCR between control and experimental groups are in compliance with the results by Demir et al (2003), Acikgoz et al (2004), Botsoglou et al (2004), Gunal et al (2006), Mohamed et al (2008), Seven et al (2008), respectively Tekeli et al (2011), who point that extracts from plants and propolis do not have a significant impact on improving FCR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Feed conversion ratio at the end of fattening was lower in experimental groups (1.64 to 1.67), compared with control (1.69), which is in compliance with the results by Shalmany and Shivazad (2006), who also recorded a decrease of FCR after the application of propolis extract in the diet of chickens Ross 308. The results of FCR are comparable with values achieved by Haščík et al (2010), but Novel et al (2009) found the FCR in 42-days old chickens at the level of 2.20 to 2.30. Inconclusive differences (P ≥ 0.05) in FCR between control and experimental groups are in compliance with the results by Demir et al (2003), Acikgoz et al (2004), Botsoglou et al (2004), Gunal et al (2006), Mohamed et al (2008), Seven et al (2008), respectively Tekeli et al (2011), who point that extracts from plants and propolis do not have a significant impact on improving FCR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This result agrees with De Silva and Kalubowila (2012) and Netshipale et al (2012) who observed the same feed intake of restricted birds. The results of feed intake in this study do not agree with Novel et al (2009) and Boostani et al (2010) who reported reduced feed intake of restricted birds. The insignificant differences in feed conversion ratio of control, 3 and 6 h restricted group follow the findings of Dozier et al (2002) and Khajali et al (2007).…”
Section: Performance At 21 To 37 Days Oldcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Consequently, in our study, 27 and 20 d of re-alimentation after 7 and 14 d of feed restriction, respectively, allowed to fully recover the RW of breast. Novel et al (2009) and Onbaşilar et al (2009) showed that feeding restriction had limited effect on carcass characteristics. Ocak and Sivri (2008) reported that, during re-alimentation period, the carcass components reacted more rapidly than the whole body.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%