2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dopant nature on structures and lattice dynamics of proton-conducting BaZrO3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radius of the circle, r , as obtained from the fits in Figure , represents, in the case of jump diffusion over two sites (proton transfers), half of the jump length and, in the case of jump diffusion over four sites (O–H rotation), the O–H distance. The obtained jump lengths, 1.4 to 1.6 Å for proton transfers and 0.85 to 1.0 Å for O–H rotational motions (Table S1 in SI), are in good agreement with both crystallographic data and calculations of O–O distances (∼2.6 to 2.9 Å) and calculated O–H bond lengths (0.97 to 1.00 Å) ,,,, as well as with jump distances obtained in other QENS studies of the same and similar materials such as SrCe 0.95 Yb 0.05 H 0.02 O 2.985 and Ba­[Ca (1+ x )/3 Nb (2– x )/3 ]­O 3– x /2 . , Previous work, carried out at higher resolution (∼100 μeV) but over a smaller Q range (∼0.2 to 2.0 Å –1 ), suggested the possibility to distinguish between transfer and O–H rotational diffusion in the Q range probed by the present study. It is shown here, however, that a set of physically reasonable parameters allows a good description of the experimental data according to both models.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The radius of the circle, r , as obtained from the fits in Figure , represents, in the case of jump diffusion over two sites (proton transfers), half of the jump length and, in the case of jump diffusion over four sites (O–H rotation), the O–H distance. The obtained jump lengths, 1.4 to 1.6 Å for proton transfers and 0.85 to 1.0 Å for O–H rotational motions (Table S1 in SI), are in good agreement with both crystallographic data and calculations of O–O distances (∼2.6 to 2.9 Å) and calculated O–H bond lengths (0.97 to 1.00 Å) ,,,, as well as with jump distances obtained in other QENS studies of the same and similar materials such as SrCe 0.95 Yb 0.05 H 0.02 O 2.985 and Ba­[Ca (1+ x )/3 Nb (2– x )/3 ]­O 3– x /2 . , Previous work, carried out at higher resolution (∼100 μeV) but over a smaller Q range (∼0.2 to 2.0 Å –1 ), suggested the possibility to distinguish between transfer and O–H rotational diffusion in the Q range probed by the present study. It is shown here, however, that a set of physically reasonable parameters allows a good description of the experimental data according to both models.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…(a) Pressure-dependent Raman spectra for BaZr 0.9 Y 0.1 O 3‑δ : (i) Ba–ZrO 6 stretching, (ii) ZrO 6 torsional motion, (iii) O–Zr–O bending motion, and (iv) Zr–O stretching motion . (b) Change in phonon frequencies as a function of pressure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…At 2.5 GPa, two Raman bands at 117 and 381 cm –1 appear and become prominent with an increase in the pressure. According to the density functional theory simulation, the vibration modes at the wavenumber range of 60–139 cm –1 represent the Ba–ZrO 6 stretching motion, 169–233 cm –1 correspond to the ZrO 6 torsional motion, 270–450 cm –1 assigned to the O–Zr–O bending motion, and 456–821 cm –1 attributed to the Zr–O stretching motion. Therefore, the Raman bands at 107 and 117 cm –1 are assigned to the Ba–ZrO 6 stretching motion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be found, for the samples modified by In, the conductivity decreased significantly with increasing In concentration, although the relatively density of the samples increased accordingly. As was reported, the formation and especially mobility of proton defects are very sensitive to the dopants for BaZrO 3 ‐based oxides . In‐doped BaZrO 3 exhibits poorer hydration behavior and lower proton mobility than Y‐doped BaZrO 3 , which eventually results in lower bulk conductivity of In‐doped BaZrO 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…As was reported, the formation and especially mobility of proton defects are very sensitive to the dopants for BaZrO 3 ‐based oxides . In‐doped BaZrO 3 exhibits poorer hydration behavior and lower proton mobility than Y‐doped BaZrO 3 , which eventually results in lower bulk conductivity of In‐doped BaZrO 3 . Moreover, as can be seen in Figure , the apparent activation energy (E a ) values for proton conductivity increased correspondingly with In concentration, further suggesting that protons are more easily trapped and hence more difficult to hop in crystal lattice after In‐doping.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%