1982
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/28.1.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of duration and temperature of storage on serum analyte stability: examination of 14 selected radioimmunoassay procedures.

Abstract: We determined appropriate temperatures for sample storage and the resulting stability of 14 analytes commonly radioimmunoassayed in the clinical laboratory. Serum specimens to be tested for concentrations of cholylglycine, cortisol, digoxin, ferritin, follitropin, immunoglobulin E, lutropin, prolactin, thyroxin (also blood-spot thyroxin), triiodothyronine, and triiodothyronine uptake could be stored for up to two weeks at room temperature, refrigerated, or frozen without any loss of analyte activity. Specimens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies designed to examine the effects of storage time on serum/plasma levels of steroid hormones have compared levels of cortisol and testosterone from the same samples immediately after collection and after years of storage. In these investigations, testosterone and cortisol concentrations were stable at levels consistent with typical coefficients of variation after up to 10-11 years of storage (Wickings and Nieschlag, 1976;Kubasik et al, 1982;Das et al, 1983;Kley and Rick, 1984;Kley et al, 1985;Diver et al, 1994;Bolelli et al, 1995;Bogdan, 2000, Personal Communication). Other studies have examined effects of variation in storage conditions (e.g., repeated freeze-thaw cycles, storage at varied temperatures) on cortisol and testosterone concentrations (Wickings and Nieschlag, 1976;Kubasik et al, 1982;Das et al, 1983;Kley and Rick, 1984;Garde and Hansen, 2005) as well as CBG and SHBG (Kley and Rick, 1984;Sinnecker, 1989;Reyna et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Studies designed to examine the effects of storage time on serum/plasma levels of steroid hormones have compared levels of cortisol and testosterone from the same samples immediately after collection and after years of storage. In these investigations, testosterone and cortisol concentrations were stable at levels consistent with typical coefficients of variation after up to 10-11 years of storage (Wickings and Nieschlag, 1976;Kubasik et al, 1982;Das et al, 1983;Kley and Rick, 1984;Kley et al, 1985;Diver et al, 1994;Bolelli et al, 1995;Bogdan, 2000, Personal Communication). Other studies have examined effects of variation in storage conditions (e.g., repeated freeze-thaw cycles, storage at varied temperatures) on cortisol and testosterone concentrations (Wickings and Nieschlag, 1976;Kubasik et al, 1982;Das et al, 1983;Kley and Rick, 1984;Garde and Hansen, 2005) as well as CBG and SHBG (Kley and Rick, 1984;Sinnecker, 1989;Reyna et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Finally, plasma samples used for this study had been stored at −80 ° C for 6 years without undergoing any thaw cycles. Use of stored samples may be seen as a limitation; however, numerous publications attesting to the high stability of steroid and thyroid hormones when preserved at −80 °C have been published (Kubasik et al, 1982; Kley, Schlaghecke & Krüskemper, 1985; Garde & Hansen, 2005; EL Ezzi, El-Saidi & Kuddus, 2010; Hillebrand, Heijboer & Endert, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] However, using sample preservatives for research sample collection is inconvenient and adds to time and expense [20] and similarly some preservatives such as glycerol are unsuitable for anti-doping purpose. Previous studies have reported that plasma LH is stable after storage for 8 and 14 days after refrigeration (4 C), [39,40] for 14 days stored frozen (-6 C) [40] and for up to 9 months after -20 or -70 C storage. [41] The quantitative reproducibility of the ICL immunoassay indicates it is more robust for measurements of urinary LH for anti-doping purposes compared with the IF assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%