1990
DOI: 10.1172/jci114450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ethanol on polyamine synthesis during liver regeneration in rats.

Abstract: Ethanol consumption retards the hepatic regenerative response to injury. This may contribute to the pathogenesis of liver injury in alcoholic individuals. The mechanisms responsible for ethanol-associated inhibition of liver regeneration are poorly understood. To determine if the antiregenerative effects of ethanol involve modulation of polyamine metabolism, parameters of polyamine synthesis were compared before and during surgically induced liver regeneration in ethanol-fed rats and isocalorically maintained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our data are consistent with previous reports that showed chronic ethanol-fed rats exhibited diminished liver regeneration. 48 Surprisingly GCS-LS was not induced. The cis-acting elements, AP-1, ARE, and NF-B, implicated in mediating the effect of oxidative stress on GCS subunit gene expression were all activated in this model.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Nevertheless, our data are consistent with previous reports that showed chronic ethanol-fed rats exhibited diminished liver regeneration. 48 Surprisingly GCS-LS was not induced. The cis-acting elements, AP-1, ARE, and NF-B, implicated in mediating the effect of oxidative stress on GCS subunit gene expression were all activated in this model.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recovery (gain) of the removed liver mass was calculated according to Diehl et al (1990). All results are expressed as mean Ϯ SE.…”
Section: Calculations and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gain of liver mass as a function of time after surgical resection was calculated as described by Diehl et al (1990). All comparisons were done between means of the PH group and those of PH plus adenosine group using Sigma StatSoftware package version 3.5 for personal computers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%