2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-019-02778-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of filler type on properties of PBAT/organoclay nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the BC concentration, Table 1 highlights that the addition of the filler involved a minimum decrease in the percentage crystallinity compared to pure PBAT, although a slight increase in Tm from 129.5 Therefore, the DSC results revealed that BC did not substantially influence PBAT structure, which remained almost amorphous despite the filler addition. This result was expected since PBAT is a random copolymer characterized by low crystallinity due to its intrinsic irregularity in structure, which inhibits high crystallinity [47]. However, the slight increase in Tm confirmed that BC and PBAT were compatible to some extent, as reported in previous researches [48].…”
Section: Preliminary Investigationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Regardless of the BC concentration, Table 1 highlights that the addition of the filler involved a minimum decrease in the percentage crystallinity compared to pure PBAT, although a slight increase in Tm from 129.5 Therefore, the DSC results revealed that BC did not substantially influence PBAT structure, which remained almost amorphous despite the filler addition. This result was expected since PBAT is a random copolymer characterized by low crystallinity due to its intrinsic irregularity in structure, which inhibits high crystallinity [47]. However, the slight increase in Tm confirmed that BC and PBAT were compatible to some extent, as reported in previous researches [48].…”
Section: Preliminary Investigationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These excellent properties render PBAT a promising eco-friendly biopolymer for use as an alternative to nonbiodegradable petroleum-based polymers for a wide variety of potential applications such as food-packaging containers, waste vinyl bags, shopping bags, and mulching films. Although PBAT shows promise as a biodegradable biopolymer, its relatively high water-vapor permeability and high production cost compared with commonly used polymers may restrict its use in some commercial applications. In recent years, numerous studies have aimed at improving the applicability of PBAT by creating blends with other polymers and by producing composites with various reinforcements such as CaCO 3 and starch, carbon nanotubes, organoclay, cellulose nanocrystals, zinc oxide, and natural fibers. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCL is well known for its excellent properties (high flexibility, impact and tearing resistance) (Reul et al, 2018;Sousa et al;Silva et al, 2022). Organoclay composites are reported to improve and preserve these characteristics (Santos et al, 2019;Almeida et al, 2017;Falcão et al, 2019). The data therefore indicate that the compounds under study have efficient barrier properties for possible applications in food packaging and protective coatings, among other applications.…”
Section: Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 91%