2010
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.49.09mb04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Film Thickness and Crystal Orientation on the Constituent Phase in Epitaxial BiFeO3–BiCoO3 Films Grown on SrTiO3 Substrates

Abstract: The crystal symmetries of epitaxial (1-x)BiFeO3–xBiCoO3 films (x=0–0.46) grown on (100)SrTiO3, (110)SrTiO3, and (111)SrTiO3 substrates covered with/without SrRuO3 layers were systematically investigated as a function of film thickness and the crystal orientation of the substrates. Raman analysis was an effective method of crystal symmetry research on epitaxial BiFeO3–BiCoO3 films. Crystal symmetry was changed from being rhombohedral to tetragonal through the mixture of these symmetries with increasing BiCoO3 c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BFCO thin films fabricated by chemical solution deposition (CSD) on a SrTiO 3 (STO) (001) single crystalline substrates exhibited a gradual second-order transition from rhombohedral to tetragonal phases at x ¼ 0:15{0:20. 19) This transition behavior is also reported by Yasui et al [20][21][22] Because of the lattice mismatch (the in-plane lattice parameter of the rhombohedral BFO is 1.15% larger than that of STO), BFO (x ¼ 0) relaxed from the STO substrate. The in-plane lattice parameter decreased with increasing Co content x, and the tetragonal x ¼ 0:30 film had no mismatch with the substrate.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…BFCO thin films fabricated by chemical solution deposition (CSD) on a SrTiO 3 (STO) (001) single crystalline substrates exhibited a gradual second-order transition from rhombohedral to tetragonal phases at x ¼ 0:15{0:20. 19) This transition behavior is also reported by Yasui et al [20][21][22] Because of the lattice mismatch (the in-plane lattice parameter of the rhombohedral BFO is 1.15% larger than that of STO), BFO (x ¼ 0) relaxed from the STO substrate. The in-plane lattice parameter decreased with increasing Co content x, and the tetragonal x ¼ 0:30 film had no mismatch with the substrate.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The presence of secondary phases in the BiFeO 3 -BiCoO 3 system for cobalt concentrations up to 30% is attributed to the system instability, as previously reported in MOCVD samples . 45,46 In fact, pure BiCoO 3 is stable only at high pressure. 24 With the incorporation of La in BFCO30, the presence of secondary phases is suppressed and the (00l) reflections from La-BFCO30 sharpened, indicating the formation of pure phase epitaxial films with improved crystallinity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigations have followed the PZT system, the solid solutions between rhombohedral BFO and tetragonal Bi based perovskite with a large c / a ratio, e.g., BiCoO 3 ( c / a = 1.267) and BiZn 0.5 Ti 0.5 O 3 ( c / a = 1.211). , These studies are classified as B-site substitution of the perovskite oxide. Among them, a MPB with a √2 a × √2 a × a monoclinic Cm structure, where a was a lattice constant of a cubic perovskite that was essentially the same as that of PZT, was found in BiFe 1– x Co x O 3 with x ∼ 0.3 synthesized under high pressure. , In the vicinity of the MPB composition, the polarization vector of BiFe 1– x Co x O 3 rotates as a function of composition and temperature .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%