2001
DOI: 10.1002/1521-4095(200110)13:20<1563::aid-adma1563>3.0.co;2-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Gas Exposure on Field Emission Properties of Carbon Nanotube Arrays

Abstract: Carbon nanotubeshave many advantages over conventional semiconductor and metal emitters for field emission displays (FEDs). However, the origin of the current saturation seen in carbon nanotubes at high fields is poorly understood. Here the effect of gas adsorbates on the field emission properties of patterned carbon nanotube arrays, such as the one shown in the Figure, is investigated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, 19 The LDOS of the openended tube, however, clearly reveals that p z orbitals are the main source of the LDOS peak at the Fermi level as shown in Fig. 4͑a͒.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2, 19 The LDOS of the openended tube, however, clearly reveals that p z orbitals are the main source of the LDOS peak at the Fermi level as shown in Fig. 4͑a͒.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, we consider the emission current stability (J/J i = 68.9% after 2 h) of the SN-a FWCNT-based field emitter to be the worst among the three samples. It is well known that the emission current of nanotubes decreases when a nanotube tip with attached residual oxygen gases is degraded by Joule heating under a high electric field [32]. In fact, the outgassing from the cathode is one of the main reasons for vacuum deterioration, resulting in degradation of the emission current.…”
Section: Field Emission Properties Of Fwcnts/teos Thin Film Field Emimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron source exhibits good emission stability behaviors in wide pressure range. However, the current fluctuation increases to ±4.24 % in 2.59 × 10 −9  Torr vacuum, comparing with ±2.72 % in 2.48 × 10 −10  Torr, which is believed to be related to the gas adsorption, such as nitrogen and hydrogen [16, 28].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%