1985
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(85)90139-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of gravity on laminar premixed gas combustion I: Flammability limits and burning velocities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
45
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation that microgravity smolder rates fall between normal-gravity upward and downward configurations is similar to observed lean premixed flame propagation rates in the standard flammability limit tube [19] and large combustion vessel [20,21]. The reaction front smolder temperature in microgravity is seen to also fall between those encountered in normal-gravity upward and downward tests.…”
Section: Forced Flow Testssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation that microgravity smolder rates fall between normal-gravity upward and downward configurations is similar to observed lean premixed flame propagation rates in the standard flammability limit tube [19] and large combustion vessel [20,21]. The reaction front smolder temperature in microgravity is seen to also fall between those encountered in normal-gravity upward and downward tests.…”
Section: Forced Flow Testssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Post-flight gas and TGA analyses are conducted on the microgravity smolder products (gas and solid). [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]1996). The experiments investigate the propagation of smolder along a polyurethane foam sample under both diffusion-driven (quiescent) and forced-flow-driven opposed smoldering.…”
Section: Flight Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a), comparison between computation and microgravity experiments in spherically expanding flames [20,21] and tubes [22] and earth-gravity experiments specially designed for low S L [23] is more favorable without reabsorption because optically-thin conditions applied to these experiments. The discrepancy between computation and experiment is significant even though the chemistry and transport models employed predict S L away from the limits quite well [24].…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the aforementioned considerations, the main goal of this investigation was to conduct an experimental and computational study of FL's at variable pressures, and assess the validity of the previous theoretical findings [17]. The experiments were performed for lean CH 4 /air mixtures in a variable pressure, counterflow flame rig at 1-g as well as lg utilizing the drop tower at the National Microgravity Laboratory of China (NMLC) in Beijing. The experiments were modeled using detailed description of chemical kinetics, molecular transport, and thermal radiation and sensitivity analysis was implemented to provide insight into the kinetic mechanisms that control FL's.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, experiments need to be conducted under micro-gravity or reduced-gravity (lg) conditions (e.g. [4][5][6][7]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%