“…The higher reversion rate in our study than in the Norwegian study could be because of our higher rate of compliance to LTBI treatment, lower median IFN-γ baseline level (1.05 IU mL vs. 3.48 IU mL), and a higher proportion of patients completing serial QFT-IT testing (95 vs. 52 ) enabling more accurate assessment of IFN-γ responses. Compared to the studies on non-HIV-infected individuals (11,13,14,(18)(19)(20), the higher reversion rate in this study could be explained by lower median baseline IFN-γ level and longer period between initial and subsequent tests (24 months vs. 4-9 months) after LTBI treatment that allowed detection of delayed reversion. In addition, most of the studies on non-HIV-infected persons did not assess adherence to LTBI treatment, which may have an effect on the IFN-γ response.…”