2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of labor market policies on unemployment when firms adapt their recruitment strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The job fair exhibits make job fair for visitors in Malang easier to find a job. These study results are consistent with Sengul (2017) that job fairs can reduce unemployment. Higher job opportunities themselves ultimately has an impact on reducing unemployment.…”
Section: Direct Effect Of Job Fair On Unemployment Reductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The job fair exhibits make job fair for visitors in Malang easier to find a job. These study results are consistent with Sengul (2017) that job fairs can reduce unemployment. Higher job opportunities themselves ultimately has an impact on reducing unemployment.…”
Section: Direct Effect Of Job Fair On Unemployment Reductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is also necessary to emphasize that the foundation of effective implementing LMP is the simultaneous occurrence of certain determinants of the effectiveness. Empirical literature indicates, for example, that even moderate benefit sanctions increase the job-finding rates of the unemployed (Cahuc & Zylberberg, 2004;Sengul, 2017). Sanctions also increase the exit rate from unemployment to an ALMP for flat-rate labour market support recipients (Busk, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are general gender indicators that have been calculated to measure the degree of gender inequality, namely the Gender-related Development Index (GDI) and the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM), they do not measure gender inequality in unemployment (Busse and Spielmann 2006). Unlike Gimenez-Nadal and Molina (2014), Ollikainen (2006), Sengul (2017), and many others who compared gender unemployment rates of women with men unemployment rates, or Bakas and Papapetrou (2014), Peiro et al (2012) and others who analyzed the gender inequality in unemployment using the ratio of female to male unemployment rates or their differences, as proposed by Queneau and Sen (2007), we propose a unemployment gender inequality indicator that extracts the tendency of unemployment gender inequality from the tendency of the unemployment rates by gender. Gender inequality has already been described by many characteristics such as education (Weiss 2000), age (Maloney 2011), duration of unemployment (Pašic et al 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%