2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of large deformation on creep property evaluation by small-specimen bending tests

Abstract: A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. AbstractPhysical mechanisms at different length scales have to be taken into account while predicting the overall failure of nuclear graphite structures of advanced gas cooled graphite … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 However, such a method involves extracting a considerable amount of material from the component. 10 Compared with traditional creep specimens undergoing solely uniaxially tensile loading, small specimens under constant loading show nonuniform stresses and strains, such as small punch testing (SPT) specimens, 3-point bending specimens, and clamped beam bending testing (CBT) specimens. To cope with this dilemma, small specimen testing technique (SSTT) rises and develops rapidly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,2 However, such a method involves extracting a considerable amount of material from the component. 10 Compared with traditional creep specimens undergoing solely uniaxially tensile loading, small specimens under constant loading show nonuniform stresses and strains, such as small punch testing (SPT) specimens, 3-point bending specimens, and clamped beam bending testing (CBT) specimens. To cope with this dilemma, small specimen testing technique (SSTT) rises and develops rapidly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 However, the measurement accuracy of SSTT seems insufficient in many occasions because of a lack of fundamental understanding. 10 Compared with traditional creep specimens undergoing solely uniaxially tensile loading, small specimens under constant loading show nonuniform stresses and strains, such as small punch testing (SPT) specimens, 3-point bending specimens, and clamped beam bending testing (CBT) specimens. The difference in loading configuration may give rise to the coappearance of multiple creep deformation mechanisms within the same specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the unique advantages the small punch creep test has is that one of the specimen dimensions (the thickness) is very small (~ 0.5mm), however, up to date, there are no universally accepted conversion techniques available for data interpretation, due to its complicated deformation and failure mechanisms [9]. Previous research has been carried out using miniaturised beam on pure bending specimen type [12][13][14][15], however, their method does not relate the damage parameters into correlation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%