2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of m-plane GaN substrate miscut on InGaN/GaN quantum well growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, In incorporation in InGaN is also strongly affected by a small miscut of the substrate, which was experimentally reported for c-plane [42,115] and m-plane substrates [116,117]. This is clear evidence that In incorporation is strongly affected by the surface bond arrangement even in the case of a high V/III ratio.…”
Section: Vapor and Surface Reactionssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, In incorporation in InGaN is also strongly affected by a small miscut of the substrate, which was experimentally reported for c-plane [42,115] and m-plane substrates [116,117]. This is clear evidence that In incorporation is strongly affected by the surface bond arrangement even in the case of a high V/III ratio.…”
Section: Vapor and Surface Reactionssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Therefore, we can conclude that the peak shift can be caused by the In concentration difference between the well-faceted and non-faceted samples. It is known that In incorporation efficiencies on different GaN surface planes are different 44 52 53 54 55 . T. Wunder et al reported a 50% higher indium incorporation for {1 01} semipolar facets in comparison to c-plane growth 44 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of GaN substrates sliced from a bulk boule, the proper surface preparation before the epitaxy is a real challenge. In addition, it was observed that the substrate misorientation is a key parameter in the growth of good quality epilayers on non-polar GaN substrates [5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%