Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3025171.3025234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Motion-Gesture Recognizer Error Pattern on User Workload and Behavior

Abstract: Bi-level thresholding is a motion gesture recognition technique that mediates between false positives, and false negatives by using two threshold levels: a tighter threshold that limits false positives and recognition errors, and a looser threshold that prevents repeated errors (false negatives) by analyzing movements in sequence. In this paper, we examine the effects of bi-level thresholding on the workload and acceptance of endusers. Using a wizard-of-Oz recognizer, we hold recognition rates constant and adj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They focus in particular on classifiers, and proposed a survey instrument to measure users' perception of accuracy. Both Kay et al and Katsuragawa et al noticed that different recognizers are perceived differently by users [8,9]. However, acceptable accuracy was only investigated in the context of automation with which user is passive [9], like notifications, or input recognition [8,16].…”
Section: Automated Tasks and Acceptable Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They focus in particular on classifiers, and proposed a survey instrument to measure users' perception of accuracy. Both Kay et al and Katsuragawa et al noticed that different recognizers are perceived differently by users [8,9]. However, acceptable accuracy was only investigated in the context of automation with which user is passive [9], like notifications, or input recognition [8,16].…”
Section: Automated Tasks and Acceptable Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Kay et al and Katsuragawa et al noticed that different recognizers are perceived differently by users [8,9]. However, acceptable accuracy was only investigated in the context of automation with which user is passive [9], like notifications, or input recognition [8,16]. Automated tasks were not considered, and usability only in the context of input recognition.…”
Section: Automated Tasks and Acceptable Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides hand tracking, vision-based systems have been proposed for face tracking [23][24][25], action tracking [26][27][28] and gait tracking [29,30]. Although, the outcomes of the contemporary research works favour gesture-based interfaces for interactions [31,32], such systems are fairly more error-prone [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%