2023
DOI: 10.1007/s43452-023-00673-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of number of tool shoulders on the quality of steel to magnesium alloy dissimilar friction stir welds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface roughness was measured via a Mitutoyo surface roughness tester to evaluate the roughness average (Ra) at different TTAs. Figure 5b,c show surface rough- Flow ring is a phenomenon that occurs via surface ripple in the welding area that is in contact with the tool shoulder [24]. The ripple spacing of this study is measured to indicate the visual surface quality of the welded joint as well as the mechanical action in the stir zone.…”
Section: Surface Flow Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surface roughness was measured via a Mitutoyo surface roughness tester to evaluate the roughness average (Ra) at different TTAs. Figure 5b,c show surface rough- Flow ring is a phenomenon that occurs via surface ripple in the welding area that is in contact with the tool shoulder [24]. The ripple spacing of this study is measured to indicate the visual surface quality of the welded joint as well as the mechanical action in the stir zone.…”
Section: Surface Flow Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In 1.5° TTA, the extrusion of AA1050 from the AS to the RS improved, but in 3° TTA, the big gap between tool and workpiece during forward moving increases the flash surface at both the AS and the RS. Flow ring is a phenomenon that occurs via surface ripple in the welding area that is in contact with the tool shoulder [24]. The ripple spacing of this study is measured to indicate the visual surface quality of the welded joint as well as the mechanical action in the stir zone.…”
Section: Surface Flow Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the maximum UTS recorded in the study was 567 MPa in sample B2, while the minimum UTS was 471 MPa in sample A0, highlighting the significant influence of processing parameters on the mechanical strength of the FSP samples (Figure 9a). The analysis of elongation provided insights into the ductility of the FSP samples, elucidating the influence of process parameters, such as tool rotation and nanopowder addition, on material deformation properties [24]. Across the A-series samples, elongation values ranged from 17% for sample A3 to 31% for samples A0, A1, and A2.…”
Section: Tensile Strength Of Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In samples without nanopowder, elongation increased with higher tool rotational velocities, indicating enhanced ductility. The analysis of elongation provided insights into the ductility of the FSP samples, elucidating the influence of process parameters, such as tool rotation and nanopowder addition, on material deformation properties [24]. Across the A-series samples, elongation values ranged from 17% for sample A3 to 31% for samples A0, A1, and A2.…”
Section: Tensile Strength Of Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the AZ31B/SK7 joint, the interface layer at the keyhole exhibited a thickness of 0.9 µm, while for the AZ31B/DP980 and AZ31B/316L joints, it measured 1.5 µm and only 0.6 µm, respectively. Within a certain range, an increased compound thickness at the interface was more advantageous for joint performance [30]. In order to gain further insights into its composition and structure, quantitative point analysis using EPMA was performed at various positions within the keyholes of three joints, and the corresponding results are presented in Tables 6-8.…”
Section: Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%