2016
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of participants’ static stretching knowledge or deception on the responses to prolonged stretching

Abstract: Much of the static stretching (SS) literature reports performance impairments with prolonged SS. However, it has been acknowledged that a limitation of these studies is participants' knowledge or bias. Since many participants have knowledge of the literature, their performance may be subconsciously influenced by expectations. Hence, the objective of this study was to examine the effect of stretching knowledge or deception on subsequent force output following SS. Two groups of male participants who were either … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…responses to stretching interventions. 40 Furthermore, analgesia induced by techniques such as self-massage could have been mediated by autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity; 41 that is, a shift from sympathetic to parasympathetic tone. The mechanism behind this ANS shift remains unclear, but it can be hypothesized that certain hormones and neuropeptides may be at play given that massage has been associated with changes in stress hormones 42 (e.g., cortisol) and neuropeptides 9 (e.g., endogenous opioids, oxytocin and endocannabinoids), and that the aforementioned hormones and neuropeptides that are associated with a sympathetic shift also play a role in descending modulatory pathways, 43,44 which could account for changes in ROM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…responses to stretching interventions. 40 Furthermore, analgesia induced by techniques such as self-massage could have been mediated by autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity; 41 that is, a shift from sympathetic to parasympathetic tone. The mechanism behind this ANS shift remains unclear, but it can be hypothesized that certain hormones and neuropeptides may be at play given that massage has been associated with changes in stress hormones 42 (e.g., cortisol) and neuropeptides 9 (e.g., endogenous opioids, oxytocin and endocannabinoids), and that the aforementioned hormones and neuropeptides that are associated with a sympathetic shift also play a role in descending modulatory pathways, 43,44 which could account for changes in ROM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common threats to external validity in previous studies include (a) total stretching durations being longer than those typically performed by athletes (17,18), (b) the stretching rarely being followed by other important components of a sport-specific warm-up, including high-intensity and movement pattern-specific exercises (1,19), even though it may mitigate the negative effects of stretching (20), (c) participants being only minimally familiarized with the tests (athletes, on the other hand, are familiar with their sporting skills), (d) differences existing in the execution (movement pattern) of static versus dynamic stretches, and (e) the imposition of nonstretching rest periods in control conditions/groups, which would not be performed in sports (4). Also, studies have been susceptible to serious threats to internal validity, such as the expectancy effects of knowledgeable participants (21) and lack of experimenter blinding (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants were verbally and vigorously encouraged to exert maximal effort during both MVCs. The peak force and the force exerted within the first 100ms of effort (instantaneous strength) were analyzed [10, 49, 50]. The prolonged effects of stretching on velocity specific isokinetic torque were also examined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%