1996
DOI: 10.1016/0584-8547(96)01522-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of power and carrier gas flow rate on the tolerance to water loading in inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
81
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A robust condition was obtained at high RF power and low nebulizer gas flow rate, as expected and described in the literature. [36][37][38] A response surface maximum point was not obtained; an ever-increasing pattern was observed until the instrumental limits. The thresholds between robust and non-robust conditions were established.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A robust condition was obtained at high RF power and low nebulizer gas flow rate, as expected and described in the literature. [36][37][38] A response surface maximum point was not obtained; an ever-increasing pattern was observed until the instrumental limits. The thresholds between robust and non-robust conditions were established.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This concept has become quite common in ICP optimization studies and can be easily measured using ionic-to-atomic line intensity ratio as Mg II (280 nm) and Mg I (285 nm). 27,36,[40][41][42] Since ionic lines are more sensitive to changes in atomization and excitation conditions than atomic lines, the intensity ratio of the lines is a practical criterion to evaluate the plasma robustness and analytical performance. A robust condition can be achieved when higher RF applied power level (≥ 1200 W) is combined with lower nebulizer gas flow rate (≤ 0.6 L min -1 ) 37,38,43,44 and this condition is characterized by the high intensity ratio of Mg II/Mg I, values above 8.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible reason for the lack of a general theory on matrix effects is that most of the reports on matrix effects in ICP-AES used direct solution nebulization or solution nebulization followed by desolvation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The aerosol is not completely dry even with desolvation, and water remains a major component among the injected species [16]. Matrix interference may be partially influenced by the processes of water vaporization, dissociation, and ionization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix interference may be partially influenced by the processes of water vaporization, dissociation, and ionization. Matrix effects may be more easily observed and studied if a solid sample introduction technique is used [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation