Effect of probiotic (Bacillusspp.) addition during larvae and postlarvae culture of the white shrimpLitopenaeus vannamei

Silva, Emanuell Felipe; Soares, Marcelo Augusto da Silva; Calazans, Nathalia; Vogeley, Joana Lyra; Valle, Bruna Cáritas do; Soares, Roberta; Peixoto, Sílvio

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03001.x

Cited by 64 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This was attributed to the water quality improvement by the bacterial inoculations, due to degradation of organic matter. In accordance with our results, there are also reports of enhancement in shrimp performance when probiotics are used as feed additives (Wang et al, 2005;De Souza et al, 2012;Silva et al, 2012). The SGR of P. vannamei was observed to be maximum in S. cerevisiae treated group (10.6±0.03%) followed by Bs>Lc>Lr>Sb>Ent>Cp (Table 1).…”

Section: Evaluation Of Probiotics In Penaeus Vannameisupporting

confidence: 91%

Evaluation of different probiotic strains for growth performance and immunomodulation in Pacific white shrimp Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of antibiotics in aquaculture can prevent certain diseases, however, its use is highly restricted due to several environmental and human health problems like development of antibacterial resistance. Probiotics are widely used for improving production of aquatic animals by means of improving water quality as well as by nutritional and immune modulation in animals thus, helping in preventing diseases. The present study was aimed to evaluate different strains of probiotics viz., a commercial probiotic, Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus sp., Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces boulardii on the growth, microbial load and immunomodulatory performance of the Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei. Seven probiotic feeds each containing 5 x 10 9 CFU ml -1 of respective probiotics kg -1 of feed were prepared by top coating on a pellet feed containing 35% protein and duration of the experiment was 75 days. All of the 6 selected strains of probiotics except the commercial one influenced the growth significantly when fed to the shrimp, compared to control group. Specific growth rate (SGR), average daily growth (ADG) and survival rate were observed to be higher in probiotic fed groups. Maximum growth was recorded in S. cerevisiae fed groups (8.05±0.21 g), followed by B. subtilis (7.65±0.21 g), while the control animals showed an average growth of 4.85±0.49 g with percentage improvement in the range of 50-95% when compared to all other treatments. Total heterotrophic count significantly (p<0.05) increased in the rearing water of B. subtilis treated group (8.995± 0.021 x 10 3 cfu ml -1 ) when compared to that of control (5.475± 0.003 X 10 3 cfu ml -1 ) and total vibrio load was greatly reduced in B. subtilis (1.42 ± 0.04 x 10 3 cfu ml -1) and S. cerevisiae (1.47 ± 0.01 x 10 3 cfu ml -1 ) treated water compared to control (4.265 ± 0.06 x 10 3 cfu ml -1). Non-specific immunity in terms of total haemocyte count (THC) was found to be significantly (p<0.05) higher in B. subtilis (12.4±0.8 10 6 cells ml ) treated groups. The probiotic effect was found to be beneficial for better growth and immunomodulation, which was however found to be strain-specific.

show abstract

Section: Evaluation Of Probiotics In Penaeus Vannameisupporting

confidence: 91%

Evaluation of different probiotic strains for growth performance and immunomodulation in Pacific white shrimp Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, other organisms, such as fungi and yeasts, have also been used for probiotic purposes (Devajara et al, 2002;Ribeiro et al, 2008). Research on probiotics for aquatic animals is increasing with the demand for sustainable, environmentally friendly aquaculture (Wang et al, 2005;Farzanfar, 2006;Ravi et al, 2007;Decamp et al, 2008;Li et al, 2008;Gomez et al, 2009;Guo et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2009;Ninawe & Selvin, 2009;Peraza-Gómes et al, 2009;Pai et al, 2010;Shen et al, 2010;Silva et al, 2011Silva et al, , 2012Souza et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of a commercial probiotic on bacterial and phytoplankton concentration in intensive shrimp farming (Litopenaeus vannamei) recirculation systems

Paiva-Maia¹,

Alves-Modesto²,

Otavio-Brito³

et al. 2013

lajar

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a commercial probiotic on the bacterial and phytoplankton concentration in intensive shrimp farming (Litopenaeus vannamei) with a recirculation system, for one culture period in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Ponds, with mean area of 2.6 ha, were stocked with a density of 98 shrimp m -2 . A commercial probiotic was prepared following the manufacture's specifications and sprayed on the surface of the ponds seven days prior to stocking and then on a weekly basis until harvest. The same procedures were used with all treatments (control and probiotic), with regard to feeding, liming, fertilization, use of molasses and monitoring of water quality. Field data were analyzed using ANOVA, the Tukey test and Chi-square tests. No significant differences between treatments were found for water quality data, but treatment means showed significant differences for total heterotrophic bacteria in the sediment (5.181 ± 0.34x10 4 cfu g -1 and 5.749 ± 0.67x10 4 cfu g -1 ), total heterotrophic bacteria in surface water (4.514 ± 0.95x 10 4 cfu m L -1 and 4.136 ± 0.81x10 4 cfu m L -1 ) and positive sucrose in surface water (2.438 ± 0.72x10 4 cfu m L -1 and 2.203 ± 0.76x10 4 cfu m L -1 ), respectively, for the control and probiotic treatment. Significant differences were also observed throughout the weeks for total heterotrophic bacteria in the sediment, positive and negative sucrose in the sediment, total heterotrophic bacteria in surface and bottom water, and Pyrrophyta percentage values between 10 and 16 weeks. These results showed that the probiotic causes changes in the total heterotrophic bacteria in the sediment and percentage values of Pyrrophyta concentration, improving the environmental quality of the sediment and water in ponds with closed recirculation systems. Keywords: Litopenaeus vannamei, heterotrophic bacteria, Vibrio, microalgae, aquaculture, Brazil.Efecto de un probiótico comercial sobre la concentración de bacterias y fitoplancton en cultivo de camarón (Litopenaeus vannamei) con sistemas de recirculación RESUMEN. El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar el efecto de un probiótico comercial sobre la concentración de bacterias y fitoplancton en el cultivo intensivo de camarón (Litopenaeus vannamei) con sistemas de recirculación, para un ciclo de cultivo en Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil. La siembra de camarones se hizo con una densidad de 98 camarones m -2 en viveros de 2,6 ha. Se preparó un probiótico comercial siguiendo las especificaciones del fabricante y rociado sobre la superficie de los estanques siete días antes de la siembra, y después se aplicó semanalmente hasta la cosecha. Los mismos procedimientos con respecto a la alimentación, encalado, fertilización, uso de la melaza y monitoreo de la calidad del agua se utilizaron en todos los tratamientos (control y probiótico). Los datos fueron analizados utilizando el análisis de varianza, prueba de Tukey y Chi-cuadrado. Para los datos de calidad de agua no hubo diferencias significativas entre los trat...

show abstract

“…A utilização desses suplementos microbianos (probióticos) tem crescido consideravelmente na aquicultura devido a demanda por práticas ambientalmente seguras (WANG, 2008, GATESOUPE, 1999. Dentre os benefícios associados a esses suplementos estão a melhoria na qualidade da água de cultivo (SILVA et al, 2012, LAKSH-MANAN;SOUNDARAPANDIAN, 2008, WANG et al, 2005, redução do estresse e aumento da resistência a doenças (TSENG et al, 2009) e ganhos significativos em termos de sobrevivência e crescimento dos camarões cultivados (ZHOU et al, 2009, SILVA et al, 2013.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Cultivo Do Camarão Marinho Com Bioflocos Sob Diferentes Níveis De Proteína Com E Sem Probiótico

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO -O presente trabalho avaliou o desempenho do camarão marinho Litopenaeus vannamei alimentado com dietas de diferentes níveis protéicos em sistema de bioflocos com e sem a adição de probiótico. Foi adotado um delineamento experimental inteiramente casualizado com arranjo fatorial 4×2, com quatro níveis de proteína na dieta (20, 25, 30 e 35% PB), como primeiro fator (P20, P25, P30 e P35), e a adição de probiótico na água de cultivo, como segundo fator (P20 Pro , P25 Pro , P30 Pro e P35 Pro ). Foram utilizados 24 tanques em fibra de vidro (800 L volume útil) estocados com 300 camarões m -3 (peso inicial 1,55±0,01 g). As variáveis de qualidade da água foram mensuradas periodicamente e não apresentaram diferença estatística, exceto o teor de nitrito, influenciado significativamente (P<0,05) pelos níveis de proteína. Após 50 dias de cultivo o peso médio final dos camarões foi de 7,2±0,4 g (P≥0,05) entre os tratamentos. A interação entre os níveis protéicos e a adição de probiótico influenciaram significativamente (P<0,05) na sobrevivência (70,5-90,0%) e na biomassa final (1,3-2,0 Kg m -3 ). Dessa forma, em cultivo intensivo de L. vannamei, com utilização de bioflocos como fonte de alimento suplementar, é possível reduzir os níveis de proteína da ração de 35 para 25% sem comprometer o desempenho zootécnico dos camarões e a qualidade da água. Palavras-chave:Litopenaeus vannamei. Flocos microbianos. Melaço. Proteína. Sem renovação de água. MARINE SHRIMP CULTURE WITH BIOFLOCS UNDER DIFFERENT PROTEIN LEVELS WITH AND WITHOUT PROBIOTICABSTRACT -This study aimed to evaluate the culture of Litopenaeus vannamei marine shrimp fed with different protein levels diets in heterotrophic systems with and without probiotic addition. It was adopted a completely randomized design with 4x2 factorial arrangement, using four dietary protein levels (20, 25, 30 e 35% CP), as the first factor (P20, P25, P30, and P35), and probiotic addition in the water, as the second factor (P20 Pro , P25 Pro P30 Pro e P35 Pro ). For this were used 24 fiberglass tanks (800 L working volume) stocked with 300 shrimp m -3 (initial weight 1.55±0.01 g). Water quality parameters were analyzed periodically and showed no significant differences, except nitrite that was influenced by the protein levels (P<0.05). After 50 culture days, shrimp final weight averaged 7.2±0.4 g (P≥0.05). The interaction of protein levels vs. probiotic addition influenced significantly (P<0.05) the survival (70.6 to 90.0%) and final biomass (1.3-2.0 Kg m -3 ). In Litopenaeus vannamei intensive culture with the utilization of biofloc as the supplemental food, it is possible to reduce the protein levels of feed from 35 to 25%, without compromising the shrimp growth performance and water quality of the culture.

show abstract

Effect of probiotic (Bacillusspp.) addition during larvae and postlarvae culture of the white shrimpLitopenaeus vannamei

Cited by 64 publications

References 43 publications

Evaluation of different probiotic strains for growth performance and immunomodulation in Pacific white shrimp Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931

Evaluation of different probiotic strains for growth performance and immunomodulation in Pacific white shrimp Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931

Effect of a commercial probiotic on bacterial and phytoplankton concentration in intensive shrimp farming (Litopenaeus vannamei) recirculation systems

Cultivo Do Camarão Marinho Com Bioflocos Sob Diferentes Níveis De Proteína Com E Sem Probiótico

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About