2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0211-9_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of seawater irrigation on biomass production and ion composition of seven halophytic species in Morocco

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in K + content, in other varieties (Q1 and Q3) under high salinity, may be related to its replacement by the Na + for a function in osmoregulation. Such observation was considered as a good marker of 'Halophytism' to escape from Na + toxic effect (Harrouni et al 2003). Particularly, variety Q4 exhibited the high selectivity for potassium as expressed by K + /Na + ratio of shoot and root, especially under 500 mM NaCl (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in K + content, in other varieties (Q1 and Q3) under high salinity, may be related to its replacement by the Na + for a function in osmoregulation. Such observation was considered as a good marker of 'Halophytism' to escape from Na + toxic effect (Harrouni et al 2003). Particularly, variety Q4 exhibited the high selectivity for potassium as expressed by K + /Na + ratio of shoot and root, especially under 500 mM NaCl (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sodium and chloride are the most commonly assimilated ions for osmotic adjustment in halophytes. The decrease in K + content with salinity may be related to its replacement by Na + for a function in osmoregulation (Harrouni, Daoud & Koyro, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative growth rates for dicotyledonous halophytes in 200–360 m m NaCl range, on a dry mass basis, between 6 and 160 mg g −1 d −1 , and, for monocotyledonous halophytes, between 15 and 26 mg g −1 d −1 (Rozema & van Diggelen, 1991; Wickens & Cheeseman, 1991; Nerd & Pasternak, 1992; Ayala & O’Leary, 1995; Khan et al ., 1999; Harrouni et al ., 2003; Debez et al ., 2006); in terms of ash‐free dry mass, relative growth rates of 10 species of dicotyledonous halophytes lay between 31 and 70 mg g −1 d −1 (Glenn & O’Leary, 1984). Growth rates of the dicotyledonous halophytes can match those of glycophytes with annual dry matter production obtained from field experiments on saline soils of between 0.08 and 18 t ha −1 yr −1 (O’Leary et al ., 1985): these higher‐end rates are, as discussed by Glenn et al .…”
Section: Growth and Osmotic Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%