2017
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of short-term feed restriction on temporal changes in milk components and mammary lipogenic gene expression in mid-lactation Holstein dairy cows

Abstract: Investigations of the temporal changes in mammary gene expression that occur during sudden diet change have been limited by the use of mammary tissue as the source of RNA because of the invasive nature of mammary biopsy procedures. However, the cytosolic crescent, present in 1% of the largest milk fat globules, contains mammary epithelial cell RNA that has become trapped between the inner and outer milk fat globule membranes during final formation and secretion of milk fat into the lumen of the mammary alveoli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative effect of feed restriction on milk production has been reported in many studies in dairy cows (Andersen et al, 2004;Radcliff et al, 2006;Guinard-Flament et al, 2007;Gross et al, 2011). As expected, feed restriction also affected the composition of milk by reducing milk protein and lactose percentages, and protein, lactose, and fat yields, as previously reported (Guinard-Flament et al, 2007;Dessauge et al, 2011;Gross et al, 2011;Abdelatty et al, 2017). Probably as a consequence of lipomobilization, the decrease in fat yield (−3.5%) was smaller than the decrease in milk yield.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The negative effect of feed restriction on milk production has been reported in many studies in dairy cows (Andersen et al, 2004;Radcliff et al, 2006;Guinard-Flament et al, 2007;Gross et al, 2011). As expected, feed restriction also affected the composition of milk by reducing milk protein and lactose percentages, and protein, lactose, and fat yields, as previously reported (Guinard-Flament et al, 2007;Dessauge et al, 2011;Gross et al, 2011;Abdelatty et al, 2017). Probably as a consequence of lipomobilization, the decrease in fat yield (−3.5%) was smaller than the decrease in milk yield.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Feeding level is one of the main management factors affecting milk yield and mammary gland metabolism. In lactating dairy cows, feed restriction is known to decrease milk yield (Nørgaard et al, 2005(Nørgaard et al, , 2008Guinard-Flament et al, 2007;Gross et al, 2011;Abdelatty et al, 2017). The extent of milk yield loss depends on the duration and intensity of feed restriction, as well as the lactation stage of dairy cows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cytoplasmic crescents in bovine milk are small and are present in a low proportion of milk fat globules [29]. However, the relatively high fat content of ruminant milk allows the abundance of cytoplasmic material in milk fat to be adequate for RNA isolation [33,35]. Compared with the common technique of mammary tissue biopsy, milk fat collection to obtain RNA from secretory cells for in vivo signaling analysis is noninvasive and enables a larger number of animals to be sampled at a higher frequency, and with relative ease compared to tissue biopsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a severe feed restriction in early lactation that reduced milk production by 38% was accompanied by decreases in LALBA and CSN3 gene expression (Dessauge et al, 2011), with no effect on CSN1S1 mRNA level. In another study, a severe feed restriction (40% less than the control diet) in mid-lactation dairy cows reduced the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism (Abdelatty et al, 2017). Thus, the effect of feed restriction on secretory cell activity likely depends on the severity of the challenge and the timing of its application.…”
Section: Effect Of Challenges On Secretory Cell Activitymentioning
confidence: 97%